Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Int Endod J. 2013 May;46(5):413-8. doi: 10.1111/iej.12004. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
To compare the antimicrobial activities of Activ Point (Roeko, Langenau, Germany), Calcium Hydroxide Plus Point (Roeko, Langenau, Germany), calcium hydroxide, 1% chlorhexidine gel and bioactive glass (S53P4) against Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans.
One hundred and twenty extracted single-rooted human teeth were used. After removing the crowns, root canals were prepared by using the Protaper rotary system. Following autoclave sterilization, root canals were incubated at 37 °C with E. faecalis ATCC 29212 and S. mutans RSHM 676 for 1 week. The specimens, which were divided into five treatment groups for each microorganism according to the intracanal medicament used, were tested in 10 experimental runs. In each experimental run, 10 roots were included as treatment, one root as positive control and one root as sterility control. Sterile paper points were utilized to take samples from root canals after the incubation of teeth in thioglycollate medium at 37 °C for 1 week. Samples taken from teeth by sterile paper points were inoculated onto sheep blood agar, and following an overnight incubation, the colonies grown on sheep blood agar were counted and interpreted as colony-forming units. Results were tested statistically by using Kruskal-Wallis and Conover's nonparametric multiple comparison tests.
CHX gel (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), Activ Point (P = 0.003 and P = 0.002) and Ca(OH)₂ (P = 0.010 and P = 0.005) were significantly more effective against E. faecalis than that of Ca(OH)₂ Plus Point and bioactive glass, respectively. On the other hand, compared with Ca(OH)₂ , CHX gel (P < 0.001), and Activ Point (P < 0.001), bioactive glass (P = 0.014) produced significantly lower colony counts of S. mutans. When compared with the positive control, treatment with Ca(OH)₂ Plus Point (P = 0.085 and P = 0.066) did not produce significantly lower colony counts of E. faecalis and S. mutans, respectively.
Compared with the medicaments having an antimicrobial effect because of their alkaline pH, the medicaments containing chlorhexidine were effective against both E. faecalis and S. mutans.
比较 Activ Point(德国罗科,朗根瑙)、钙水门汀加量型糊剂(德国罗科,朗根瑙)、氢氧化钙、1%洗必泰凝胶和生物活性玻璃(S53P4)对粪肠球菌和变异链球菌的抗菌活性。
本研究使用了 120 颗离体单根人牙。在去除牙冠后,采用 Protaper 根管旋转系统进行根管预备。经过高压蒸汽灭菌,将根管在 37°C 下用粪肠球菌 ATCC 29212 和变异链球菌 RSHM 676 孵育 1 周。根据所用根管内药物,将样本分为 5 个治疗组,每个微生物组各有 10 个样本。在每个实验运行中,包括 10 个根作为治疗组,1 个根作为阳性对照组,1 个根作为无菌对照组。将牙齿在硫代甘油培养基中 37°C 孵育 1 周后,用无菌纸尖从根管中取样。将无菌纸尖从牙齿上取的样本接种到绵羊血琼脂上,经过一夜孵育后,计算在绵羊血琼脂上生长的菌落数,并解释为菌落形成单位。结果采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Conover 非参数多重比较检验进行统计学检验。
与氢氧化钙 Plus 点和生物活性玻璃相比,洗必泰凝胶(P < 0.001 和 P < 0.001)、Activ Point(P = 0.003 和 P = 0.002)和氢氧化钙(P = 0.010 和 P = 0.005)对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果更为显著。另一方面,与氢氧化钙相比,洗必泰凝胶(P < 0.001)和 Activ Point(P < 0.001)、生物活性玻璃(P = 0.014)对变异链球菌的菌落计数明显较低。与阳性对照组相比,氢氧化钙加量型糊剂的治疗(P = 0.085 和 P = 0.066)对粪肠球菌和变异链球菌的菌落计数均无明显降低。
与因碱性 pH 值而具有抗菌作用的药物相比,含洗必泰的药物对粪肠球菌和变异链球菌均有效。