• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗方式和放疗技术对局部晚期口咽癌患者结局和毒性的影响。

The impact of treatment modality and radiation technique on outcomes and toxicity of patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2013 Feb;123(2):386-93. doi: 10.1002/lary.23699.

DOI:10.1002/lary.23699
PMID:23404489
Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the impact of treatment modality and radiation technique on oncologic outcomes and toxicity of patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer (OPC).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of outcomes and toxicity.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2011, 204 consecutive patients with locally advanced OPC were treated with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy using 3-dimensional conformal (3DCRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Endpoints were local control (LC), regional control (RC), disease-free survival (DFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 44 months (range 4-134), the 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of LC, RC, DFS, CSS, and OS were 78%, 92%, 60%, 64%, and 48%, respectively. Grade 3 mucositis and dysphagia (feeding-tube dependency) were reported in 75% and 65%, respectively. The overall incidence of grade ≥ 2 and grade 3 late toxicities were 44% and 16%, respectively. Dysphagia and xerostomia were the most frequently reported late toxicity. Chemotherapy was significantly predictive for improved outcomes and increased toxicity. IMRT was significantly correlated with reduced toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to radiation alone, chemoradiotherapy significantly improved oncologic outcomes, but with significantly increased toxicity. Compared to 3DCRT, the introduction of IMRT resulted in a significant reduction of acute and late toxicity with slightly better, or at least comparable, outcomes. Despite the improvements achieved by the implementation of chemo-IMRT, different new strategies to further improve outcome and reduce toxicity need to be thoroughly investigated in prospective, preferably, randomized trials.

摘要

目的/假设:研究治疗方式和放射技术对局部晚期口咽癌(OPC)患者的肿瘤学结果和毒性的影响。

研究设计

回顾性结果和毒性分析。

方法

在 2000 年至 2011 年间,204 例局部晚期 OPC 患者接受了根治性(放化疗)治疗,使用三维适形(3DCRT)或调强放疗(IMRT)。终点是局部控制(LC)、区域控制(RC)、无病生存率(DFS)、无病特异生存率(CSS)、总生存率(OS)和毒性。

结果

中位随访时间为 44 个月(范围 4-134),5 年 Kaplan-Meier 估计 LC、RC、DFS、CSS 和 OS 分别为 78%、92%、60%、64%和 48%。分别有 75%和 65%的患者出现 3 级黏膜炎和吞咽困难(需依赖饲管进食)。≥2 级和 3 级晚期毒性的总发生率分别为 44%和 16%。吞咽困难和口干是最常见的晚期毒性。化疗与改善的结果和增加的毒性显著相关。IMRT 与降低毒性显著相关。

结论

与单纯放疗相比,放化疗显著改善了肿瘤学结果,但毒性显著增加。与 3DCRT 相比,调强放疗的引入显著降低了急性和晚期毒性,且结果略有改善或至少相当。尽管通过实施放化疗-IMRT 取得了进展,但需要在前瞻性、优选随机试验中彻底研究新的策略,以进一步改善结果并降低毒性。

相似文献

1
The impact of treatment modality and radiation technique on outcomes and toxicity of patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer.治疗方式和放疗技术对局部晚期口咽癌患者结局和毒性的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Feb;123(2):386-93. doi: 10.1002/lary.23699.
2
Toxicity and outcome of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: a matched-pair analysis.调强放疗与三维适形放疗治疗口咽癌的毒性反应和结局:配对分析。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;12(2):123-30. doi: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500305. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
3
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma: impact of tumor volume.口咽癌的调强放射治疗:肿瘤体积的影响
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 May 1;59(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.08.004.
4
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience.调强放射治疗在口咽癌治疗中的应用:纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心的经验
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Feb 1;64(2):363-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.006. Epub 2005 May 31.
5
A comparison of outcomes using intensity-modulated radiation therapy and 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in treatment of oropharyngeal cancer.调强放疗与三维适形放疗治疗口咽癌的疗效比较。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Apr;140(4):331-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.6777.
6
Effect of radiation techniques in treatment of oropharynx cancer.放射技术在口咽癌治疗中的作用
Laryngoscope. 2008 Apr;118(4):635-9. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31815fdf0e.
7
Toxicity, quality of life, and functional outcomes of 176 hypopharyngeal cancer patients treated by (chemo)radiation: the impact of treatment modality and radiation technique.176 例接受(放)化疗的下咽癌患者的毒性、生活质量和功能结局:治疗方式和放疗技术的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Aug;122(8):1789-95. doi: 10.1002/lary.23387.
8
Highly-conformal intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduced toxicity without jeopardizing outcome in patients with paranasal sinus cancer treated by surgery and radiotherapy or (chemo)radiation.高适形调强放疗可降低副鼻窦癌患者手术联合放疗或放化疗毒性而不影响疗效。
Oral Oncol. 2012 Sep;48(9):905-11. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.03.024. Epub 2012 May 12.
9
Simultaneous integrated boost using intensity-modulated radiotherapy compared with conventional radiotherapy in patients treated with concurrent carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma.同期顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶化疗联合同步调强放疗与常规放疗治疗局部晚期口咽癌的比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):582-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.061. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
10
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy followed by a brachytherapy boost for oropharyngeal cancer.调强放疗联合近距离放疗治疗口咽癌。
Head Neck. 2013 Dec;35(12):1689-97. doi: 10.1002/hed.23244. Epub 2013 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Biotène Versus HydraSmile for Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: Randomized Double-Blind Cross-Over Study.比奥泰恩与水润微笑用于放射性口干症的对比:随机双盲交叉研究。
OTO Open. 2025 Jan 3;9(1):e70038. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70038. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
2
Comparative evaluation of oral mucositis in oral cancer patients undergoing 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy.对接受三维适形放射治疗和调强放射治疗且有或无化疗的口腔癌患者口腔黏膜炎的比较评估。
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2023 Oct-Dec;27(4):720-726. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_31_23. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
3
Enteral Nutrition during Radiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancers: Prevalence and Prognostic Factors Based on HPV Status (A GETTEC Study).
口咽癌放疗期间的肠内营养:基于人乳头瘤病毒状态的患病率及预后因素(一项GETTEC研究)
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 28;12(9):3169. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093169.
4
Dose Escalation of Oropharyngeal Cancer: Long-Time Follow-Up and Side Effects.口咽癌的剂量递增:长期随访及副作用
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 30;15(9):2580. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092580.
5
Skin/mucosa avoidance radiotherapy (SMART) versus conventional volumetric arc-based radiotherapy (VMAT) for the treatment of head and neck cancer: Dosimetric feasibility study.皮肤/黏膜回避放疗(SMART)与常规容积弧形放疗(VMAT)治疗头颈部癌症的比较:剂量学可行性研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Aug;24(8):e14000. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14000. Epub 2023 May 4.
6
Associations between patient-reported late effects and systemic cytokines in long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy.头颈部癌症放疗后长期生存患者报告的晚期效应与全身细胞因子之间的关系。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Aug;17(4):1082-1093. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01273-1. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
7
Pathogenesis and Amelioration of Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis.辐射诱导口腔黏膜炎的发病机制与缓解。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Mar;23(3):311-324. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00959-z. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
8
High miR-511-3p Expression as a Potential Predictor of a Poor Nutritional Status in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Subjected to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.高miR-511-3p表达作为接受调强放疗的头颈癌患者营养状况差的潜在预测指标。
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 2;11(3):805. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030805.
9
Understanding Cachexia in Head and Neck Cancer.了解头颈癌中的恶病质
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Aug 27;8(5):527-538. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon-2145. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
10
Optimizing oropharyngeal cancer management by using proton beam therapy: trends of cost-effectiveness.利用质子束疗法优化口咽癌治疗:成本效益趋势
BMC Cancer. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):944. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08638-2.