• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管紧张素受体阻滞剂联合钙通道阻滞剂或利尿剂对伴有或不伴有肥胖的老年高血压患者血压的不同降低效果。

Differential blood pressure reductions by angiotensin receptor blocker plus calcium channel blocker or diuretic in elderly hypertension with or without obesity.

作者信息

Kato Johji, Yokota Naoto, Tamaki Noboru, Kariya Sumito, Kita Toshihiro, Ayabe Takao, Eto Tanenao, Kitamura Kazuo

机构信息

Frontier Science Research Center, University of Miyazaki, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, Japan.

出版信息

J Am Soc Hypertens. 2012 Nov-Dec;6(6):393-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jash.2012.09.001
PMID:23102995
Abstract

We conducted the Miyazaki Olmesartan Therapy for Hypertension in the EldeRly (MOTHER) study, which suggested that there are preferable effects of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), olmesartan, plus a calcium channel blocker (CCB) over the ARB plus a diuretic, in elderly patients with hypertension. In this subanalysis, we examined whether obesity influences the efficacies of these combination therapies. The study subjects were 58 hypertensive patients ages 65 to 85, who had been randomly assigned to either group treated with olmesartan plus a CCB or a diuretic and completed the treatment for 6 months. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were reduced following these combination treatments in nonobese and obese patients. In the CCB combination, blood pressure reductions in nonobese patients were larger than in obese patients at 1 and 3 months, and serum creatinine remained unchanged despite the greater reduction of blood pressure. Meanwhile, such differences were not noted in the diuretic groups. Plasma aldosterone was significantly reduced in nonobese patients of two combination groups, but not in those with obesity. ARB plus CCB combination therapy might be preferably chosen for nonobese elderly patients, whereas the influence of obesity seems smaller in the efficacy of ARB plus a diuretic.

摘要

我们开展了老年宫崎奥美沙坦高血压治疗(MOTHER)研究,该研究表明,对于老年高血压患者,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)奥美沙坦加钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)的联合治疗效果优于ARB加利尿剂。在这项亚组分析中,我们研究了肥胖是否会影响这些联合治疗的疗效。研究对象为58名年龄在65至85岁的高血压患者,他们被随机分配至接受奥美沙坦加CCB或利尿剂治疗的组中,并完成了6个月的治疗。非肥胖和肥胖患者在接受这些联合治疗后,收缩压和舒张压均有所降低。在CCB联合治疗组中,非肥胖患者在1个月和3个月时的血压降幅大于肥胖患者,尽管血压降幅更大,但血清肌酐水平保持不变。同时,利尿剂组未观察到此类差异。两个联合治疗组中的非肥胖患者血浆醛固酮水平显著降低,而肥胖患者则未降低。对于非肥胖老年患者,可能更宜选择ARB加CCB联合治疗,而肥胖对ARB加利尿剂疗效的影响似乎较小。

相似文献

1
Differential blood pressure reductions by angiotensin receptor blocker plus calcium channel blocker or diuretic in elderly hypertension with or without obesity.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂联合钙通道阻滞剂或利尿剂对伴有或不伴有肥胖的老年高血压患者血压的不同降低效果。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2012 Nov-Dec;6(6):393-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
2
Comparison of combination therapies, including the angiotensin receptor blocker olmesartan and either a calcium channel blocker or a thiazide diuretic, in elderly patients with hypertension.比较联合治疗方案,包括血管紧张素受体阻滞剂奥美沙坦和钙通道阻滞剂或噻嗪类利尿剂,在老年高血压患者中的应用。
Hypertens Res. 2011 Mar;34(3):331-5. doi: 10.1038/hr.2010.233. Epub 2010 Dec 2.
3
Rationale, design and patient baseline characteristics of OlmeSartan and calcium antagonists randomized (OSCAR) study: a study comparing the incidence of cardiovascular events between high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy and combination therapy of ARB with calcium channel blocker in Japanese elderly high-risk hypertensive patients (ClinicalTrials. gov no. NCT00134160).奥美沙坦与钙拮抗剂随机对照(OSCAR)研究的原理、设计及患者基线特征:一项比较日本老年高危高血压患者中高剂量血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)单药治疗与ARB联合钙通道阻滞剂治疗心血管事件发生率的研究(ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT00134160)
Hypertens Res. 2009 Jul;32(7):575-80. doi: 10.1038/hr.2009.60. Epub 2009 May 15.
4
Angiotensin-II receptor antagonist combined with calcium channel blocker or diuretic for essential hypertension.血管紧张素 II 受体拮抗剂联合钙通道阻滞剂或利尿剂治疗原发性高血压。
Hypertens Res. 2009 Nov;32(11):962-8. doi: 10.1038/hr.2009.133. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
5
Rationale, study design and implementation of the COLM study: the combination of OLMesartan and calcium channel blocker or diuretic in high-risk elderly hypertensive patients.COLM研究的原理、研究设计与实施:奥美沙坦与钙通道阻滞剂或利尿剂联合用于高危老年高血压患者
Hypertens Res. 2009 Feb;32(2):163-7. doi: 10.1038/hr.2008.31. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
6
Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in Japanese elderly, high-risk, hypertensive patients.血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂在日本老年、高危、高血压患者中的应用。
Am J Med. 2012 Oct;125(10):981-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Apr 14.
7
Renoprotective effect of calcium channel blockers in combination with an angiotensin receptor blocker in elderly patients with hypertension. A randomized crossover trial between benidipine and amlodipine.钙通道阻滞剂联合血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在老年高血压患者中的肾脏保护作用。贝尼地平与氨氯地平的随机交叉试验。
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2010 Jan;32(1):1-7. doi: 10.3109/10641960902929446.
8
Preferable effects of olmesartan/calcium channel blocker to olmesartan/diuretic on blood pressure variability in very elderly hypertension: COLM study subanalysis.奥美沙坦/钙通道阻滞剂与奥美沙坦/利尿剂对高龄高血压患者血压变异性的影响比较:COLM研究亚组分析
J Hypertens. 2015 Oct;33(10):2165-72. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000668.
9
Combination therapy of hypertension in the elderly: a subgroup analysis of the Combination of OLMesartan and a calcium channel blocker or diuretic in Japanese elderly hypertensive patients trial.老年高血压的联合治疗:奥美沙坦与钙通道阻滞剂或利尿剂联合用于日本老年高血压患者试验的亚组分析
Hypertens Res. 2015 Jan;38(1):89-96. doi: 10.1038/hr.2014.144. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
10
[CCB uptitration is superior to ARB uptitration in CKD patients who do not reach target blood pressure with ARB/CCB combined therapy].对于接受ARB/CCB联合治疗后未达到目标血压的慢性肾脏病患者,钙通道阻滞剂滴定上调优于血管紧张素受体阻滞剂滴定上调。
Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi. 2010;52(7):945-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Aliskiren and amlodipine in the management of essential hypertension: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.阿利吉仑与氨氯地平治疗原发性高血压的疗效:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e70111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070111. Print 2013.