Suppr超能文献

老年高血压的联合治疗:奥美沙坦与钙通道阻滞剂或利尿剂联合用于日本老年高血压患者试验的亚组分析

Combination therapy of hypertension in the elderly: a subgroup analysis of the Combination of OLMesartan and a calcium channel blocker or diuretic in Japanese elderly hypertensive patients trial.

作者信息

Ogihara Toshio, Saruta Takao, Rakugi Hiromi, Saito Ikuo, Shimamoto Kazuaki, Matsuoka Hiroaki, Teramukai Satoshi, Higaki Jitsuo, Ito Sadayoshi, Shimada Kazuyuki

机构信息

Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Osaka, Japan.

Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2015 Jan;38(1):89-96. doi: 10.1038/hr.2014.144. Epub 2014 Sep 25.

Abstract

Combination of OLMesartan and a calcium channel blocker or a diuretic in Japanese elderly hypertensive patients (COLM) trial demonstrated that olmesartan combinations with a CCB or diuretic have similar effects on reducing cardiovascular risk in elderly hypertensive patients. However, the safety profiles suggest that olmesartan combined with CCB may be preferable to olmesartan combined with diuretic. In this subgroup analysis, we further evaluated the effects and safety of these combinations in elderly (65-74 years old (y.o.)) and very elderly (75-84 y.o.) hypertensive patients. In the COLM trial, 5141 patients (2918 elderly and 2223 very elderly) were randomly assigned to receive olmesartan-based therapy with either CCB or diuretic. The hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals, respectively, in the elderly age group and in the very elderly group were: 1.04 (0.72-1.50; olmesartan plus CCB vs. olmesartan plus diuretic, P = 0.85) and 0.71 (0.51-0.99, P = 0.045) for the primary composite end point, and 1.07 (0.67-1.72, P = 0.77) and 0.64 (0.42-0.98, P = 0.036) for the composite of hard end points. The hazard ratios for stroke (fatal and non-fatal) were 1.48 (0.88-2.48; olmesartan plus CCB vs. olmesartan plus diuretic, P = 0.13) and 0.63 (0.39-1.02, P = 0.059) (interaction-P = 0.019). Withdrawal rates from the trial, withdrawal due to serious adverse event and the incidence of any adverse event were higher in the olmesartan plus diuretic group than in the olmesartan plus CCB group in both age groups. In conclusion, angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and CCB combination may be preferable to an ARB and diuretic combination in the very elderly hypertensive patients for the reduction of cardiovascular risk, particularly for the reduction in stroke risk.

摘要

奥美沙坦与钙通道阻滞剂或利尿剂联合用于日本老年高血压患者(COLM)试验表明,奥美沙坦与CCB或利尿剂联合使用对降低老年高血压患者心血管风险具有相似的效果。然而,安全性分析表明,奥美沙坦与CCB联合使用可能优于奥美沙坦与利尿剂联合使用。在这项亚组分析中,我们进一步评估了这些联合用药方案在老年(65 - 74岁)和高龄(75 - 84岁)高血压患者中的疗效和安全性。在COLM试验中,5141例患者(2918例老年患者和2223例高龄患者)被随机分配接受基于奥美沙坦的治疗,联合CCB或利尿剂。在老年组和高龄组中,主要复合终点的风险比及95%置信区间分别为:1.04(0.72 - 1.50;奥美沙坦加CCB对比奥美沙坦加利尿剂,P = 0.85)和0.71(0.51 - 0.99,P = 0.045);硬终点复合指标的风险比及95%置信区间分别为:1.07(0.67 - 1.72,P = 0.77)和0.64(0.42 - 0.98,P = 0.036)。中风(致命和非致命)的风险比分别为1.48(0.88 - 2.48;奥美沙坦加CCB对比奥美沙坦加利尿剂,P = 0.13)和0.63(0.39 - 1.02,P = 0.059)(交互作用P = 0.019)。在两个年龄组中,奥美沙坦加利尿剂组的试验退出率、因严重不良事件导致的退出率以及任何不良事件的发生率均高于奥美沙坦加CCB组。总之,对于高龄高血压患者,为降低心血管风险,尤其是降低中风风险,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)与CCB联合使用可能优于ARB与利尿剂联合使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97c5/4287656/8cc9b4f9bca3/hr2014144f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验