Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0230, USA.
Ann Neurol. 2012 Oct;72(4):564-70. doi: 10.1002/ana.23633.
Deposition of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide in neuritic plaques is a requirement for the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD). Although the continued development of in vivo imaging agents such as Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) is promising, the diagnosis of AD is still challenging. This can be partially attributed to our lack of a detailed understanding of the interrelationship between the various pools and species of Aβ and other common indices of AD pathology. We hypothesized that recent advances in our ability to accurately measure Aβ postmortem (for example, using PiB), could form the basis of a simple means to deliver an accurate AD diagnosis.
We conducted a comprehensive analysis of the amount of Aβ40 and Aβ42 in increasingly insoluble fractions, oligomeric Aβ, and fibrillar Aβ (as defined by PiB binding), as well as plaques (diffuse and neuritic), and neurofibrillary tangles in autopsy specimens from age-matched, cognitively normal controls (n = 23) and AD (n = 22) cases, across multiple brain regions.
Both PiB binding and the amount of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-soluble Aβ were able to predict disease status; however, SDS-soluble Aβ was a better measure. Oligomeric Aβ was not a predictor of disease status. PiB binding was strongly related to plaque count, although diffuse plaques were a stronger correlate than neuritic plaques.
Although postmortem PiB binding was somewhat useful in distinguishing AD from control cases, SDS-soluble Aβ measured by standard immunoassay was substantially better. These findings have important implications for the development of imaging-based biomarkers of AD.
β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)在神经突斑块中的沉积是阿尔茨海默病(AD)诊断的必要条件。尽管像匹兹堡化合物 B(PiB)这样的体内成像剂的不断发展很有前景,但 AD 的诊断仍然具有挑战性。这在一定程度上归因于我们对 Aβ的各种池和物种与 AD 病理的其他常见指标之间的相互关系缺乏详细了解。我们假设,我们准确测量死后 Aβ的能力的最新进展(例如,使用 PiB),可以作为提供准确 AD 诊断的简单方法的基础。
我们对越来越不溶性的 Aβ40 和 Aβ42 分数、寡聚 Aβ和纤维状 Aβ(如 PiB 结合所定义)以及斑块(弥漫性和神经突性)以及神经原纤维缠结在年龄匹配的认知正常对照(n = 23)和 AD(n = 22)病例的尸检标本中进行了全面分析,跨越多个大脑区域。
PiB 结合和十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)可溶性 Aβ的量都能够预测疾病状态;然而,SDS 可溶性 Aβ是更好的衡量标准。寡聚 Aβ不是疾病状态的预测指标。PiB 结合与斑块计数密切相关,尽管弥漫性斑块比神经突性斑块相关性更强。
虽然死后 PiB 结合在区分 AD 与对照病例方面有些有用,但通过标准免疫测定测量的 SDS 可溶性 Aβ要好得多。这些发现对 AD 成像生物标志物的发展具有重要意义。