Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Science, PO Box 5003, Ås 1432, Norway.
Genet Sel Evol. 2012 Oct 30;44(1):30. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-30.
Simulation studies have shown that accuracy and genetic gain are increased in genomic selection schemes compared to traditional aquaculture sib-based schemes. In genomic selection, accuracy of selection can be maximized by increasing the precision of the estimation of SNP effects and by maximizing the relationships between test sibs and candidate sibs. Another means of increasing the accuracy of the estimation of SNP effects is to create individuals in the test population with extreme genotypes. The latter approach was studied here with creation of double haploids and use of non-random mating designs.
Six alternative breeding schemes were simulated in which the design of the test population was varied: test sibs inherited maternal (Mat), paternal (Pat) or a mixture of maternal and paternal (MatPat) double haploid genomes or test sibs were obtained by maximum coancestry mating (MaxC), minimum coancestry mating (MinC), or random (RAND) mating. Three thousand test sibs and 3000 candidate sibs were genotyped. The test sibs were recorded for a trait that could not be measured on the candidates and were used to estimate SNP effects. Selection was done by truncation on genome-wide estimated breeding values and 100 individuals were selected as parents each generation, equally divided between both sexes.
Results showed a 7 to 19% increase in selection accuracy and a 6 to 22% increase in genetic gain in the MatPat scheme compared to the RAND scheme. These increases were greater with lower heritabilities. Among all other scenarios, i.e. Mat, Pat, MaxC, and MinC, no substantial differences in selection accuracy and genetic gain were observed.
In conclusion, a test population designed with a mixture of paternal and maternal double haploids, i.e. the MatPat scheme, increases substantially the accuracy of selection and genetic gain. This will be particularly interesting for traits that cannot be recorded on the selection candidates and require the use of sib tests, such as disease resistance and meat quality.
模拟研究表明,与传统的水产养殖基于同胞的方案相比,基因组选择方案在准确性和遗传增益方面有所提高。在基因组选择中,可以通过增加 SNP 效应估计的精度和最大化测试同胞和候选同胞之间的关系来最大化选择的准确性。提高 SNP 效应估计准确性的另一种方法是在测试群体中创建具有极端基因型的个体。后一种方法在这里通过创建双单倍体和使用非随机交配设计进行了研究。
模拟了六种替代的育种方案,其中测试群体的设计有所不同:测试同胞继承母系 (Mat)、父系 (Pat) 或母系和父系的混合 (MatPat) 双单倍体基因组,或者通过最大亲缘交配 (MaxC)、最小亲缘交配 (MinC) 或随机交配 (RAND) 获得测试同胞。对 3000 个测试同胞和 3000 个候选同胞进行了基因型分析。对无法在候选者身上测量的性状记录了测试同胞,并用于估计 SNP 效应。通过全基因组估计育种值的截断进行选择,每代选择 100 个个体作为亲本,男女各占一半。
结果表明,与 RAND 方案相比,MatPat 方案的选择准确性提高了 7%至 19%,遗传增益提高了 6%至 22%。这些增加在较低遗传力下更大。在所有其他情况下,即 Mat、Pat、MaxC 和 MinC,选择准确性和遗传增益没有明显差异。
总之,使用父系和母系双单倍体的混合物设计测试群体,即 MatPat 方案,可大大提高选择的准确性和遗传增益。对于无法在选择候选者身上记录的性状,例如抗病性和肉质,这将特别有趣。