• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新的根管刷洗技术在去除根管系统中氢氧化钙方面的有效性:一项扫描电子显微镜研究。

Effectiveness of a new canal brushing technique in removing calcium hydroxide from the root canal system: A scanning electron microscope study.

作者信息

Gorduysus Melahat, Yilmaz Zeliha, Gorduysus Omer, Atila Burcu, Karapinar Senem Oransal

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Dentistry, Sihhiye Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2012 Oct;15(4):367-71. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.101909.

DOI:10.4103/0972-0707.101909
PMID:23112486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3482752/
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of Canal Brush technique removal Ca(OH)(2) from the root canal system using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen teeth were instrumented up to #40 and dressed with Ca(OH)(2). Ca(OH)(2) was removed with master apical file (MAF) (Group 1, n:6) and CanalBrush technique (Group 2, n:6). Six teeth served as positive and negative controls. The roots were splited in the buccolingual direction and prepared for SEM examination. Two examiners evaluated the wall cleanliness then statistical analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney U and Friedman tests.

RESULTS

Differences in cleanliness were observed between Group 1 and Group 2 in the apical thirds (P=0.002). In the coronal and middle thirds, there were no differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

It is essential to re-instrument the root canal walls using instrumentation techniques while irrigating with NaOCl and EDTA combination. The Canal Brush technique results in the packing effect of the Ca(OH)(2) through to the apex.

摘要

目的

使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估根管刷技术从根管系统中去除氢氧化钙(Ca(OH)₂)的效果。

材料与方法

18颗牙齿预备至40号锉并封入Ca(OH)₂。分别用主尖锉(MAF)(第1组,n = 6)和根管刷技术(第2组,n = 6)去除Ca(OH)₂。6颗牙齿作为阳性和阴性对照。将牙根沿颊舌方向劈开并制备用于SEM检查。两名检查者评估根管壁清洁度,然后通过曼-惠特尼U检验和弗里德曼检验进行统计分析。

结果

第1组和第2组在根尖三分之一处的清洁度存在差异(P = 0.002)。在冠部和中部三分之一处,两组之间没有差异。

结论

在用次氯酸钠(NaOCl)和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)联合冲洗时,使用器械技术对根管壁进行再预备至关重要。根管刷技术可使Ca(OH)₂一直填充至根尖。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675f/3482752/afafd3cbbace/JCD-15-367-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675f/3482752/44e4d804dd24/JCD-15-367-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675f/3482752/425c3d1680ba/JCD-15-367-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675f/3482752/afafd3cbbace/JCD-15-367-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675f/3482752/44e4d804dd24/JCD-15-367-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675f/3482752/425c3d1680ba/JCD-15-367-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675f/3482752/afafd3cbbace/JCD-15-367-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a new canal brushing technique in removing calcium hydroxide from the root canal system: A scanning electron microscope study.一种新的根管刷洗技术在去除根管系统中氢氧化钙方面的有效性:一项扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2012 Oct;15(4):367-71. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.101909.
2
Comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of Canal Brushing technique, sonic activation, and master apical file for the removal of triple antibiotic paste from root canal (in vitro study).根管刷技术、超声激活和主尖锉去除根管内三联抗生素糊剂的比较扫描电子显微镜评估(体外研究)
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Oct-Dec;6(4):517-21. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.169852.
3
Comparison of calcium hydroxide removal by self-adjusting file, EndoVac, and CanalBrush agitation techniques: An in vitro study.自调式锉、EndoVac和根管刷搅拌技术去除氢氧化钙的比较:一项体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2013 Sep;16(5):439-43. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.117523.
4
Comparison of different irrigants on calcium hydroxide medication removal: microscopic cleanliness evaluation.不同冲洗剂对氢氧化钙药物去除效果的比较:微观清洁度评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Apr;107(4):580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.008. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
5
Efficacy of 3 different irrigation systems on removal of calcium hydroxide from the root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.3种不同冲洗系统对根管内氢氧化钙清除效果的扫描电镜研究
J Endod. 2015 Jan;41(1):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.07.033. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
6
Comparison of the Efficacy of K-File, Canal Brush Technique, and Sonic Irrigation Technique in the Retrievability of Calcium Hydroxide and Metapex Intracanal Medicaments from Root Canals: An Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis.K锉、根管刷技术和声波冲洗技术在从根管中取出氢氧化钙和Metapex根管内药物的有效性比较:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描分析
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S496-S500. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_664_20. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
7
Effect of different final irrigation methods on the removal of calcium hydroxide from an artificial standardized groove in the apical third of root canals.不同最终冲洗方法对根管根尖三分之一处人工标准化凹槽中氢氧化钙清除效果的影响。
J Endod. 2014 Mar;40(3):451-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.019. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
8
Residues of calcium hydroxide-based intracanal medication associated with different vehicles: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation.基于氢氧化钙的根管内药物与不同载体的残留:扫描电子显微镜评估。
Microsc Res Tech. 2012 Jul;75(7):898-902. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22010. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
9
A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal wall cleanliness after calcium hydroxide removal using three irrigation regimens.使用三种冲洗方案去除氢氧化钙后根管壁清洁度的扫描电子显微镜评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Jan 1;8(1):11-8.
10
Removal efficacy of various calcium hydroxide/chlorhexidine medicaments from the root canal.不同氢氧化钙/氯己定药物对根管的清除效果。
Int Endod J. 2006 Jan;39(1):55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01049.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a novel chelating agent in removing calcium hydroxide using conventional and passive ultrasonic irrigation techniques.一种新型螯合剂在使用传统和被动超声冲洗技术去除氢氧化钙方面的有效性。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Oct 1;15(10):e827-e834. doi: 10.4317/jced.60782. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Effectiveness of Laser-activated and Ultrasonic Irrigation Techniques in Removal of Calcium Hydroxide and Modified Triple Antibiotic Paste from the Root Canals: An Evaluation.激光激活和超声冲洗技术去除根管内氢氧化钙和改良三联抗生素糊剂的效果评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Aug;16(Suppl 1):S1-S5. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2568.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of several techniques for the removal of calcium hydroxide medicament from root canals.几种去除根管内氢氧化钙药物的技术的疗效。
Int Endod J. 2011 Jun;44(6):505-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01854.x. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
2
Calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing removal with different rotary instruments and irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopy study.使用不同旋转器械和冲洗液去除根管内氢氧化钙封药:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
Braz Dent J. 2010;21(4):310-4. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000400004.
3
Evaluation of smear layer removal after use of a canal brush: an SEM study.
The efficacy of EndoActivator, passive ultrasonic irrigation, and Ultra X in removing calcium hydroxide from root canals: an in-vitro study.
EndoActivator、被动超声冲洗和 Ultra X 去除根管内氢氧化钙的效果:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 3;22(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02626-z.
4
Comparison of the Efficacy of K-File, Canal Brush Technique, and Sonic Irrigation Technique in the Retrievability of Calcium Hydroxide and Metapex Intracanal Medicaments from Root Canals: An Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis.K锉、根管刷技术和声波冲洗技术在从根管中取出氢氧化钙和Metapex根管内药物的有效性比较:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描分析
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S496-S500. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_664_20. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
5
Comparison of the Efficacy of CanalBrush, EndoActivator, and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation on the Removal of Triple Antibiotic Paste from Root Canal Walls: An Study.根管刷、EndoActivator与被动超声冲洗在去除根管壁三联抗生素糊剂效果的比较:一项研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Aug 6;10(4):424-430. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_13_20. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
6
Effectiveness of various irrigation protocols for the removal of calcium hydroxide from artificial standardized grooves.不同冲洗方案去除人工标准化凹槽中氢氧化钙的效果
J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 May-Jun;25(3):290-298. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0414.
7
Removal efficiency of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament with RinsEndo system in comparison with passive ultrasonic irrigation, an in vitro study.使用RinsEndo系统的氢氧化钙根管内药物去除效率与被动超声冲洗的比较:一项体外研究
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 Mar-Apr;12(2):157-60.
8
Comparison of calcium hydroxide removal by self-adjusting file, EndoVac, and CanalBrush agitation techniques: An in vitro study.自调式锉、EndoVac和根管刷搅拌技术去除氢氧化钙的比较:一项体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2013 Sep;16(5):439-43. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.117523.
使用根管刷后牙本质玷污层去除情况的扫描电镜研究
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Aug;110(2):e62-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.02.037. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
4
Efficacy of different irrigants in the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canals.不同冲洗液去除根管内氢氧化钙效果的研究。
Int Endod J. 2010 Jun;43(6):519-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01709.x.
5
Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices.当代冲洗液搅拌技术与装置综述
J Endod. 2009 Jun;35(6):791-804. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.010.
6
Comparison of different irrigants on calcium hydroxide medication removal: microscopic cleanliness evaluation.不同冲洗剂对氢氧化钙药物去除效果的比较:微观清洁度评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Apr;107(4):580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.008. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
7
Influence of different volumes of EDTA for final rinse on smear layer removal.不同体积的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)用于最终冲洗对玷污层去除的影响。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Nov;106(5):e40-3. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.06.019. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
8
Removal efficiency of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament with two calcium chelators: volumetric analysis using spiral CT, an in vitro study.两种钙螯合剂对氢氧化钙根管内药物的去除效率:使用螺旋CT的容积分析,一项体外研究
J Endod. 2006 Nov;32(11):1097-101. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.06.005.
9
A quantitative assessment of efficacy of various calcium hydroxide removal techniques.各种氢氧化钙去除技术疗效的定量评估。
J Endod. 2006 Jun;32(6):563-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.065. Epub 2006 Apr 4.
10
Determination of the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irrigants to the apical third of root canal systems.确定冲洗剂渗透至根管系统根尖三分之一处所需的最小器械尺寸。
J Endod. 2006 May;32(5):417-20. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.11.008. Epub 2006 Feb 7.