Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bistrik 7, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Psychiatr Danub. 2012 Oct;24 Suppl 3:S272-6.
Environments seen as the physical, chemical, and biological conditions to which organisms are subjected, define the ways we obtain various resources, their quantity and their quality. In interplay with our organisms, environments determine how 'fit' we are. An aspect of that fitness is the quality of mental functioning. Although there is a traditional view that there is something like an 'objective environment' and an 'effective environment', a part of the objective environment that actually affects the organism, the dividing line between the two is rather obscure. Environment in general cannot be defined without taking into account the behaviour of the organism, and it is especially challenging to define what environment means to humans, given the enormous variation and scope of human behaviours; what it is that we require and tolerate. Simultaneously, that physical environment is the broader context of what we usually term 'social environment'. This paper outlines the conceptual problems in determining and evaluating the relationship between environmental conditions and more proximal determinants of mental health, at the same time reviewing the assumptions of some of the well-known examples of that relationship.
环境被视为生物所面临的物理、化学和生物条件,决定了我们获取各种资源的方式、数量和质量。与我们的生物体相互作用,环境决定了我们的适应程度。适应程度的一个方面是心理健康的质量。尽管有一种传统观点认为存在类似于“客观环境”和“有效环境”的概念,但实际上影响生物体的客观环境的一部分,两者之间的界限相当模糊。如果不考虑生物体的行为,就无法定义环境,而鉴于人类行为的巨大变化和范围,定义人类所处的环境意味着什么,我们需要什么和能容忍什么,这尤其具有挑战性。同时,物理环境是我们通常所说的“社会环境”的更广泛背景。本文概述了确定和评估环境条件与心理健康更近端决定因素之间关系的概念问题,同时回顾了一些这种关系的著名例子的假设。