Suppr超能文献

评价单用帕洛诺司琼与帕洛诺司琼联合地塞米松预防术后恶心呕吐效果的对比研究。

The comparative study to evaluate the effect of palonosetron monotherapy versus palonosetron with dexamethasone combination therapy for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Oct;63(4):334-9. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.4.334. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists are effective and safe on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Palonosetron, the newest 5-HT3 antagonist, has potent antiemetic property. We hypothesized that a combination of palonosetron and dexamethasone could more decrease PONV than palonosetron alone.

METHODS

Among the patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gynecologic surgery, mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty or thyroidectomy under general anesthesia, eighty four female patients with at least two PONV risk factors were enrolled in this study. They were received randomly 0.075 mg palonosetron and 4 mg dexamethasone (group C) or 0.075 mg palonosetron alone (group P). The severity of PONV using Rhodes index and the percentage of complete response during postoperative 24 hours were compared between groups.

RESULTS

The frequency of mild/moderate/great/severe PONV based on Rhodes index were 9.8%/0%/0%/0% and 9.3%/2.3%/2.3%/0% in group P and group C, respectively. Complete response for PONV was observed in 90.2% and 86% of patients in group P and group C, respectively. The overall incidence of PONV in group P and C was 9.8% and 14%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences between palonosetron monotherapy and combination therapy of palonosetron and dexamethasone in patients with high emetogenic risk.

摘要

背景

5-羟色胺 3(5-HT3)受体拮抗剂对术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)有效且安全。帕洛诺司琼是最新的 5-HT3 拮抗剂,具有强大的止吐作用。我们假设帕洛诺司琼和地塞米松联合使用可以比单独使用帕洛诺司琼更能减少 PONV。

方法

在接受全身麻醉下腹腔镜妇科手术、乳突切除术伴鼓室成形术或甲状腺切除术的患者中,纳入了 84 名至少有两种 PONV 危险因素的女性患者。他们被随机分为 0.075mg 帕洛诺司琼和 4mg 地塞米松(C 组)或 0.075mg 帕洛诺司琼(P 组)。比较两组术后 24 小时内 PONV 的严重程度(Rhodes 指数)和完全缓解率。

结果

根据 Rhodes 指数,P 组和 C 组轻度/中度/重度/极重度 PONV 的发生率分别为 9.8%/0%/0%/0%和 9.3%/2.3%/2.3%/0%。PONV 的完全缓解率在 P 组和 C 组分别为 90.2%和 86%。P 组和 C 组的 PONV 总发生率分别为 9.8%和 14%。两组间无显著差异。

结论

对于高致吐风险的患者,帕洛诺司琼单药治疗与帕洛诺司琼和地塞米松联合治疗无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验