Suppr超能文献

帕洛诺司琼、地塞米松以及帕洛诺司琼联合地塞米松作为腰段剖宫产术中鞘内注射吗啡患者预防性止吐和止痒药物的比较

Comparison of Palonosetron, Dexamethasone, and Palonosetron Plus Dexamethasone as Prophylactic Antiemetic and Antipruritic Drug in Patients Receiving Intrathecal Morphine for Lower Segment Cesarean Section.

作者信息

Swaro Swastika, Karan Daisy, Banerjee Anwesha

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

出版信息

Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Apr-Jun;12(2):322-327. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_183_17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal morphine is commonly used for postcesarean analgesia. Its use is frequently associated with opioid-induced nausea, vomiting, and pruritus. Palonosetron (0.075 mg) combined with dexamethasone (8 mg) is postulated to have an additive effect over each drug alone. The study, therefore, compared the effect of intravenous (i.v.) palonosetron, dexamethasone, and palonosetron with dexamethasone combination in preventing intrathecal morphine-induced postoperative vomiting and pruritus in lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) patients.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Randomized, prospective, double-blinded, observational clinical study.

METHODS

Ninety pregnant women, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I undergoing LSCS were included in the study. They were randomly assigned to three groups - Group received 0.075 mg palonosetron i.v., Group D received dexamethasone 8 mg i.v., and Group PD received palonosetron 0.075 mg along with dexamethasone 4 mg i.v., just after spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine 2.2 ml (12 mg) and 150 μg morphine. The incidence of pruritus, nausea, vomiting, and need for rescue drug were recorded for 24 h.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Statistical analysis was performed using Student's -test for categorical variables and Chi-square test for noncategorical variables.

RESULTS

The incidence of nausea, vomiting was significantly more in Group D (40%) than Group (27%) and Group PD (20%) in 24 h. The incidence of pruritus was significantly more in Group D (6%) than Group and PD (3%). The need of rescue antiemetic was more in Group D (30%) than Group (6%) and Group PD (3%). No difference in three groups requiring rescue antipruritic drug.

CONCLUSION

Prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced vomiting and pruritus was more effective with palonosetron alone or with dexamethasone combination than dexamethasone alone. Combination of palonosetron and dexamethasone proved no better than palonosetron alone.

摘要

背景

鞘内注射吗啡常用于剖宫产术后镇痛。其使用常与阿片类药物引起的恶心、呕吐和瘙痒相关。假定帕洛诺司琼(0.075毫克)联合地塞米松(8毫克)比单独使用每种药物具有相加作用。因此,本研究比较了静脉注射帕洛诺司琼、地塞米松以及帕洛诺司琼与地塞米松联合使用在预防下段剖宫产(LSCS)患者鞘内注射吗啡引起的术后呕吐和瘙痒方面的效果。

设置与设计

随机、前瞻性、双盲观察性临床研究。

方法

90例接受LSCS的美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为I级的孕妇纳入本研究。她们被随机分为三组——P组静脉注射0.075毫克帕洛诺司琼,D组静脉注射8毫克地塞米松,PD组在使用2.2毫升(12毫克)布比卡因和150微克吗啡进行脊髓麻醉后,静脉注射0.075毫克帕洛诺司琼和4毫克地塞米松。记录24小时内瘙痒、恶心、呕吐的发生率以及使用抢救药物的情况。

统计分析

使用Student's t检验分析分类变量,使用卡方检验分析非分类变量。

结果

24小时内,D组恶心、呕吐的发生率(40%)显著高于P组(27%)和PD组(20%)。D组瘙痒的发生率(6%)显著高于P组和PD组(3%)。D组使用抢救性止吐药的需求(30%)高于P组(6%)和PD组(3%)。三组在使用抢救性止痒药方面无差异。

结论

单独使用帕洛诺司琼或与地塞米松联合使用在预防鞘内注射吗啡引起的呕吐和瘙痒方面比单独使用地塞米松更有效。帕洛诺司琼和地塞米松联合使用并不比单独使用帕洛诺司琼效果更好。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验