Nuffield Division Anaesthetics, Nuffield Department Clinical Neurosciences, Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048711. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
Implementing a recall paradigm without hypnosis, we use functional MRI (fMRI) to explore and compare nociceptive and centrally-driven pain experiences. We posit that a trace of a recent nociceptive event can be used to create sensory-re-experiencing of pain that can be qualified in terms of intensity and vividness. Fifteen healthy volunteers received three levels of thermal stimuli (warm, low pain and high pain) and subsequently were asked to recall and then rate this experience. Neuroimaging results reveal that recalling a previous sensory experience activates an extensive network of classical pain processing structures except the contralateral posterior insular cortex. Nociceptive-specific activation of this structure and the rated intensity difference between physical and recalled pain events allow us to investigate the link between the quality of the original nociceptive stimulus and the mental trace, as well as the differences between the accompanying neural responses. Additionally, by incorporating the behavioural ratings, we explored which brain regions were separately responsible for generating either an accurate or vivid recall of the physical experience. Together, these observations further our understanding of centrally-mediated pain experiences and pain memory as well as the potential relevance of these factors in the maintenance of chronic pain.
我们采用无催眠的回忆范式,利用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来探索和比较伤害感受和中枢驱动的疼痛体验。我们假设,最近的伤害性事件的痕迹可以用来产生疼痛的感觉再体验,这种感觉可以根据强度和生动度来定性。十五名健康志愿者接受了三个不同水平的热刺激(温暖、低痛和高痛),随后被要求回忆并对这种体验进行评分。神经影像学结果表明,回忆以前的感觉体验会激活经典的疼痛处理结构的广泛网络,除了对侧后岛叶皮层。这个结构的伤害感受特异性激活和物理和回忆疼痛事件之间的评分强度差异,使我们能够研究原始伤害性刺激的质量与心理痕迹之间的联系,以及伴随的神经反应之间的差异。此外,通过纳入行为评分,我们探索了哪些大脑区域分别负责生成对物理体验的准确或生动的回忆。总之,这些观察结果进一步加深了我们对中枢介导的疼痛体验和疼痛记忆的理解,以及这些因素在慢性疼痛维持中的潜在相关性。