Suppr超能文献

同时进行力量训练和耐力训练之间的相互作用。

Interaction between concurrent strength and endurance training.

作者信息

Sale D G, MacDougall J D, Jacobs I, Garner S

机构信息

Department of Physical Education, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 1990 Jan;68(1):260-70. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1990.68.1.260.

Abstract

To assess the effects of concurrent strength (S) and endurance (E) training on S and E development, one group (4 young men and 4 young women) trained one leg for S and the other leg for S and E (S+E). A second group (4 men, 4 women) trained one leg for E and the other leg for E and S (E+S). E training consisted of five 3-min bouts on a cycle ergometer at a power output corresponding to that requiring 90-100% of oxygen uptake during maximal exercise (VO2 max). S training consisted of six sets of 15-20 repetitions with the heaviest possible weight on a leg press (combined hip and knee extension) weight machine. Training was done 3 days/wk for 22 wk. Needle biopsy samples from vastus lateralis were taken before and after training and were examined for histochemical, biochemical, and ultrastructural adaptations. The nominal S and E training programs were "hybrids", having more similarities as training stimuli than differences; thus S made increases (P less than 0.05) similar to those of S+E in E-related measures of VO2max (S, S+E: 8%, 8%), repetitions with the pretraining maximal single leg press lift [1 repetition maximum (RM)] (27%, 24%), and percent of slow-twitch fibers (15%, 8%); and S made significant, although smaller, increases in repetitions with 80% 1 RM (81%, 152%) and citrate synthase (CS) activity (22%, 51%). Similarly, E increased knee extensor area [computed tomography (CT) scans] as much as E+S (14%, 21%) and made significant, although smaller, increases in leg press 1 RM (20%, 34%) and thigh girth (3.4%, 4.8%). When a presumably stronger stimulus for an adaptation was added to a weaker one, some additive effects occurred (i.e., increases in 1 RM and thigh girth that were greater in E+S than E; increases in CS activity and repetitions with 80% 1 RM that were greater in S+E than S). When a weaker, although effective, stimulus was added to a stronger one, addition generally did not occur. Concurrent S and E training did not interfere with S or E development in comparison to S or E training alone.

摘要

为评估同时进行力量(S)训练和耐力(E)训练对力量和耐力发展的影响,一组(4名年轻男性和4名年轻女性)一条腿进行力量训练,另一条腿进行力量和耐力(S+E)训练。另一组(4名男性、4名女性)一条腿进行耐力训练,另一条腿进行耐力和力量(E+S)训练。耐力训练包括在自行车测力计上进行5次3分钟的训练,功率输出对应于最大运动(最大摄氧量,VO2 max)时需要90 - 100%摄氧量的强度。力量训练包括在腿举(髋关节和膝关节伸展联合动作)器械上用尽可能重的重量进行6组15 - 20次重复。每周训练3天,共训练22周。在训练前后采集股外侧肌的针吸活检样本,检查其组织化学、生化和超微结构适应性变化。名义上的力量和耐力训练方案是“混合”的,作为训练刺激,它们之间的相似之处多于差异;因此,在与耐力相关的最大摄氧量指标方面,力量训练(S)与力量加耐力训练(S+E)的增加幅度相似(S,S+E:8%,8%),在训练前单腿最大腿举重量的重复次数[1次重复最大值(1 RM)]方面(27%,24%),以及慢肌纤维百分比方面(15%,8%);并且在80% 1 RM的重复次数(81% , 152%)和柠檬酸合酶(CS)活性方面(22%,51%),力量训练虽增加幅度较小但有显著增加。同样,耐力训练使伸膝肌面积(计算机断层扫描,CT扫描)的增加幅度与耐力加力量训练(E+S)相同(14%,21%),并且在腿举1 RM(20%,34%)和大腿围度方面(3.4%,4.8%)虽增加幅度较小但有显著增加。当将一种可能更强的适应性刺激添加到较弱的刺激上时,会出现一些累加效应(即,在E+S组中腿举1 RM和大腿围度的增加幅度大于E组;在S+E组中CS活性和80% 1 RM重复次数的增加幅度大于S组)。当将较弱但有效的刺激添加到较强的刺激上时,一般不会出现累加情况。与单独进行力量训练或耐力训练相比,同时进行力量和耐力训练不会干扰力量或耐力的发展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验