• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于丝素蛋白的骨再生支架。

Silk fibroin-based scaffolds for bone regeneration.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Matsudo, Chiba 271-8587, Japan.

出版信息

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013 Feb;101(2):295-302. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.32839. Epub 2012 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.32839
PMID:23125151
Abstract

Porous scaffolds were prepared using regenerated Bombyx mori silk fibroin dissolved in water or hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP). The effects of these two preparations on the formation and growth of new bone on implantation into the rabbit femoral epicondyle was examined. The aqueous-based fibroin (A-F) scaffold exhibited significantly greater osteoconductivity as judged by bone volume, bone mineral content, and bone mineral density at the implant site than the HFIP-based fibroin (HFIP-F) scaffold. Micro-CT analyses showed that the morphology of the newly formed bone differed significantly in the two types of silk fibroin scaffold. After 4 weeks of implantation, new trabecular bone was seen inside the pores of the A-F scaffold implant while the HFIP-F scaffold only contained necrotic cells. No trabecular bone was seen within the pores of the latter scaffolds, although the pores of these did contain giant cells and granulation tissue.

摘要

采用再生丝素蛋白制备多孔支架,该丝素蛋白溶解于水或六氟异丙醇(HFIP)中。研究了这两种方法对植入兔股骨髁后新骨形成和生长的影响。水基丝素(A-F)支架的骨体积、骨矿物质含量和骨矿物质密度显著大于 HFIP 基丝素(HFIP-F)支架,表现出更好的骨诱导性。Micro-CT 分析表明,两种丝素蛋白支架中新生骨的形态有显著差异。植入 4 周后,A-F 支架植入物的孔隙内可见新生小梁骨,而 HFIP-F 支架内仅含有坏死细胞。后者支架的孔隙内未见小梁骨,但这些支架的孔隙内含有巨细胞和肉芽组织。

相似文献

1
Silk fibroin-based scaffolds for bone regeneration.基于丝素蛋白的骨再生支架。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013 Feb;101(2):295-302. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.32839. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
2
In vivo evaluation of modified silk fibroin scaffolds with a mimicked microenvironment of fibronectin/decellularized pulp tissue for maxillofacial surgery.体内评价具有纤维连接蛋白/脱细胞牙髓组织模拟微环境的改良丝素蛋白支架在颌面外科中的应用。
Biomed Mater. 2017 Nov 22;13(1):015009. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aa853e.
3
In vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds.三维丝素蛋白支架的体内降解
Biomaterials. 2008 Aug-Sep;29(24-25):3415-28. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.002. Epub 2008 May 27.
4
Green process to prepare silk fibroin/gelatin biomaterial scaffolds.绿色工艺制备丝素蛋白/明胶生物材料支架。
Macromol Biosci. 2010 Mar 10;10(3):289-98. doi: 10.1002/mabi.200900258.
5
Silk fibroin micro-particle scaffolds with superior compression modulus and slow bioresorption for effective bone regeneration.具有优异压缩模量和缓慢生物吸收的丝素微颗粒支架,可有效促进骨再生。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 8;8(1):7235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25643-x.
6
Nonmulberry Silk Fibroin Scaffold Shows Superior Osteoconductivity Than Mulberry Silk Fibroin in Calvarial Bone Regeneration.非桑蚕丝素蛋白支架在颅骨骨再生中的成骨活性优于桑蚕丝素蛋白。
Adv Healthc Mater. 2015 Aug 5;4(11):1709-21. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201500283. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
7
Suturable regenerated silk fibroin scaffold reinforced with 3D-printed polycaprolactone mesh: biomechanical performance and subcutaneous implantation.可缝合的再生丝素蛋白支架与 3D 打印聚己内酯网复合增强:生物力学性能与皮下植入。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019 May 24;30(6):63. doi: 10.1007/s10856-019-6265-3.
8
Influence of macroporous protein scaffolds on bone tissue engineering from bone marrow stem cells.大孔蛋白质支架对骨髓干细胞骨组织工程的影响。
Biomaterials. 2005 Jul;26(21):4442-52. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.013.
9
Biocompatibility and osteoconduction of macroporous silk fibroin implants in cortical defects in sheep.大孔丝素纤维植入物在绵羊皮质骨缺损中的生物相容性和骨传导性。
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013 Sep;85(1):107-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.05.008.
10
Effect of plasma-irradiated silk fibroin in bone regeneration.等离子体处理丝素蛋白在骨再生中的作用。
J Biosci Bioeng. 2014 Sep;118(3):333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.02.016. Epub 2014 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Silk fibroin-based scaffolds for tissue engineering.用于组织工程的丝素蛋白基支架
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Apr 25;12:1381838. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1381838. eCollection 2024.
2
In vivo study of the immune response to bioengineered spider silk spheres.体内研究对生物工程蜘蛛丝球的免疫反应。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 5;12(1):13480. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17637-7.
3
Bioengineered Silkworm for Producing Cocoons with High Fibroin Content for Regenerated Fibroin Biomaterial-Based Applications.利用生物工程蚕生产高丝胶含量蚕茧,用于再生丝素生物材料相关应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jul 4;23(13):7433. doi: 10.3390/ijms23137433.
4
Effects of transgenic silk materials that incorporate FGF-7 protein microcrystals on the proliferation and differentiation of human keratinocytes.含有碱性成纤维细胞生长因子-7蛋白微晶的转基因丝绸材料对人角质形成细胞增殖和分化的影响。
FASEB Bioadv. 2020 Oct 20;2(12):734-744. doi: 10.1096/fba.2020-00078. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Influence of the Casting Concentration on the Mechanical and Optical Properties of FA/CaCl-Derived Silk Fibroin Membranes.铸膜液浓度对 FA/CaCl2 衍生丝素蛋白膜力学性能和光学性能的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Sep 13;21(18):6704. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186704.
6
Evaluation of a simple off-the-shelf bi-layered vascular scaffold based on poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone)/silk fibroin in vitro and in vivo.基于聚(L-丙交酯-共-ε-己内酯)/丝素蛋白的简易市售双层血管支架的体外和体内评价。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2019 Jun 7;14:4261-4276. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S205569. eCollection 2019.
7
Applications of Metals for Bone Regeneration.金属在骨再生中的应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Mar 12;19(3):826. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030826.
8
Auto-fluorescence of a silk fibroin-based scaffold and its interference with fluorophores in labeled cells.基于丝素蛋白的支架的自发荧光及其对标记细胞中荧光团的干扰。
Eur Biophys J. 2018 Jul;47(5):573-581. doi: 10.1007/s00249-018-1279-1. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
9
Histological Reactions and the In Vivo Patency Rates of Small Silk Vascular Grafts in a Canine Model.犬模型中小丝绸血管移植物的组织学反应及体内通畅率
Ann Vasc Dis. 2017 Jun 25;10(2):132-138. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.16-00118.
10
In vivo bioresponses to silk proteins.对丝蛋白的体内生物反应。
Biomaterials. 2015 Dec;71:145-157. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.039. Epub 2015 Aug 20.