Center for Clinical Heart Research, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Norway (A.-Å.R.P., I.S., H.A.) ; Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Norway (A.-Å.R.P., I.S., H.A.).
J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Jun;1(3):e000703. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000703. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
Patients with stable coronary artery disease on single-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin are still at risk for atherothrombotic events, and high on-aspirin residual platelet reactivity (RPR) has been suggested as a risk factor.
In this randomized trial, the association between platelet function determined by the PFA100 platelet function analyzer system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Germany) and clinical outcome in 1001 patients, all on single-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (160 mg/d) was studied. Patients were randomized to continue with aspirin 160 mg/d or change to clopidogrel 75 mg/d. A composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and unstable angina was used. At 2-year follow-up, 106 primary end points were registered. The prevalence of high RPR was 25.9%. High on-aspirin RPR did not significantly influence the primary end point in the aspirin group (13.3% versus 9.9%, P=0.31). However, in post hoc analysis, patients with von Willebrand factor levels or platelet count below median values and high on-aspirin RPR had a statistically significant higher end point rate than that of patients with low RPR (20% versus 7.5%, P=0.014, and 18.2% versus 10.8%, P=0.039, respectively). The composite end point rate in patients with high on-aspirin RPR treated with clopidogrel was not different from that of patients treated with aspirin (7.6% versus 13.3%, P=0.16).
In stable, aspirin-treated patients with coronary artery disease, high on-aspirin RPR did not relate to clinical outcome and did not identify a group responsive to clopidogrel. Post hoc subgroup analysis raised the possibility that high on-aspirin RPR might be predictive in patients with low von Willebrand factor or platelet count, but these findings will require confirmation in future studies.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT00222261. (J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e000703 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000703.).
服用阿司匹林进行单抗血小板治疗的稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者仍存在动脉粥样血栓形成事件风险,且高阿司匹林残余血小板反应性(RPR)已被认为是一个风险因素。
在这项随机试验中,研究了 1001 例患者的血小板功能,这些患者均接受阿司匹林(160mg/d)单抗血小板治疗,使用 PFA100 血小板功能分析仪系统(德国西门子医疗诊断公司)测定血小板功能,并与临床结局相关联。患者被随机分为继续服用阿司匹林 160mg/d 或改用氯吡格雷 75mg/d。主要终点为死亡、心肌梗死、缺血性卒中和不稳定型心绞痛的复合终点。随访 2 年后,共登记了 106 个主要终点。高阿司匹林 RPR 的发生率为 25.9%。在阿司匹林组,高阿司匹林 RPR 并未显著影响主要终点(13.3%比 9.9%,P=0.31)。然而,在事后分析中,血管性血友病因子水平或血小板计数低于中位数且高阿司匹林 RPR 的患者终点发生率显著高于低 RPR 的患者(20%比 7.5%,P=0.014;18.2%比 10.8%,P=0.039)。接受氯吡格雷治疗的高阿司匹林 RPR 患者的复合终点发生率与接受阿司匹林治疗的患者无差异(7.6%比 13.3%,P=0.16)。
在稳定的、接受阿司匹林治疗的冠状动脉疾病患者中,高阿司匹林 RPR 与临床结局无关,也不能识别对氯吡格雷有反应的患者。事后亚组分析提示,高阿司匹林 RPR 可能对血管性血友病因子或血小板计数低的患者具有预测作用,但这些发现需要在未来的研究中得到证实。
URL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov 唯一标识符:NCT00222261。(美国心脏协会杂志。2012;1:e000703doi:10.1161/JAHA.112.000703.)。