Suppr超能文献

基于证据的指南更新:贝尔麻痹的类固醇和抗病毒治疗:美国神经病学学会指南发展小组委员会的报告。

Evidence-based guideline update: steroids and antivirals for Bell palsy: report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.

出版信息

Neurology. 2012 Nov 27;79(22):2209-13. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318275978c. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review evidence published since the 2001 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) practice parameter regarding the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of steroids and antiviral agents for Bell palsy.

METHODS

We searched Medline and the Cochrane Database of Controlled Clinical Trials for studies published since January 2000 that compared facial functional outcomes in patients with Bell palsy receiving steroids/antivirals with patients not receiving these medications. We graded each study (Class I-IV) using the AAN therapeutic classification of evidence scheme. We compared the proportion of patients recovering facial function in the treated group with the proportion of patients recovering facial function in the control group.

RESULTS

Nine studies published since June 2000 on patients with Bell palsy receiving steroids/antiviral agents were identified. Two of these studies were rated Class I because of high methodologic quality.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

For patients with new-onset Bell palsy, steroids are highly likely to be effective and should be offered to increase the probability of recovery of facial nerve function (2 Class I studies, Level A) (risk difference 12.8%-15%). For patients with new-onset Bell palsy, antiviral agents in combination with steroids do not increase the probability of facial functional recovery by >7%. Because of the possibility of a modest increase in recovery, patients might be offered antivirals (in addition to steroids) (Level C). Patients offered antivirals should be counseled that a benefit from antivirals has not been established, and, if there is a benefit, it is likely that it is modest at best.

摘要

目的

回顾自 2001 年美国神经病学学会 (AAN) 实践参数发布以来,关于类固醇和抗病毒药物治疗贝尔面瘫的有效性、安全性和耐受性的证据。

方法

我们在 Medline 和 Cochrane 对照临床试验数据库中搜索了自 2000 年 1 月以来发表的比较接受类固醇/抗病毒药物治疗和未接受这些药物治疗的贝尔面瘫患者面部功能结局的研究。我们使用 AAN 治疗证据分类方案对每项研究进行分级(I-IV 级)。我们比较了治疗组患者恢复面部功能的比例与对照组患者恢复面部功能的比例。

结果

确定了自 2000 年 6 月以来发表的 9 项关于接受类固醇/抗病毒药物治疗的贝尔面瘫患者的研究。其中 2 项研究因方法学质量高而被评为 I 级。

结论和建议

对于新发贝尔面瘫患者,类固醇极有可能有效,应提供类固醇以增加面神经功能恢复的概率(2 项 I 级研究,A级)(风险差异 12.8%-15%)。对于新发贝尔面瘫患者,抗病毒药物联合类固醇并不能增加面部功能恢复的概率>7%。由于恢复的可能性略有增加,患者可能会被提供抗病毒药物(除了类固醇)(C 级)。向接受抗病毒药物治疗的患者提供咨询,告知他们尚未确定抗病毒药物的益处,如果有获益,最多也只是适度的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验