Piqueras-Rodríguez Francisco, Palazón-Bru Antonio, Gil-Guillén Vicente F
*Physiotherapy Office, Altiplano Salud Medical Center, Jumilla, Spain; and †Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
Clin J Sport Med. 2016 Jan;26(1):59-68. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000188.
To determine the effectiveness of active stretching (AS) versus AS plus electrical stimulation (stretching + TENS) in young soccer players with the short hamstring syndrome (SHS).
Randomized, controlled, single-blind parallel clinical trial with 3 arms and a 2-month follow-up. The assignment ratio was 1:1:1.
The study involved young federated soccer players in the town of Jumilla, in the region of Murcia (Spain), who were controlled in a physiotherapy office in 2012.
Fifty-one young soccer players (10-16 years) with SHS.
Stretching + TENS, AS, and conventional stretching.
Straight leg raise (SLR) test, popliteal angle with the passive knee extension (PKE) test, and the toe-touch test (TT).
Significant results (P < 0.05) were group 1 versus 2: (1) SLR, -5.5 degrees right; (2) PKE, +10.2 degrees right and +6.2 degrees left; and (3) range of values of clinically relevant parameters (RVCRP): relative risk (RR), 0.35 to 0.38; relative risk reduction (RRR), 0.62 to 0.65; absolute risk reduction (ARR), 0.32 to 0.39; number needed to treat (NNT), 3 to 4. Group 1 versus 3: (1) SLR, -12.3 degrees right and -10 degrees left; (2) PKE, +12.9 degrees right and +8.5 degrees left; (3) TT, -8.9 cm; and (4) RVCRP: RR, 0.12 to 0.28; RRR, 0.72 to 0.88; ARR, 0.60 to 0.83; NNT, 2 to 2. Group 2 versus 3: (1) SLR, -6.8 degrees right and -6.2 degrees left; (2) TT, -6.7 cm; (3) RVCRP: RR, 0.44 to 0.53; RRR, 0.47 to 0.56; ARR, 0.40 to 0.56; NNT, 2 to 3.
Stretching + TENS produces greater improvement than AS alone, and these are both better than conventional stretching.
The use of electrical stimulation combined with AS is a relevant technique for habitual clinical practice that should be systematically integrated in children aged 10 to 16 years who play soccer and who have the SHS.
确定主动拉伸(AS)与AS加电刺激(拉伸 + 经皮电刺激神经疗法)对患有腘绳肌短缩综合征(SHS)的年轻足球运动员的有效性。
随机、对照、单盲平行临床试验,分为3组,随访2个月。分配比例为1:1:1。
该研究涉及西班牙穆尔西亚地区胡米亚镇的年轻足球联合会球员,于2012年在一家理疗诊所进行对照研究。
51名患有SHS的年轻足球运动员(10 - 16岁)。
拉伸 + 经皮电刺激神经疗法、AS和传统拉伸。
直腿抬高(SLR)试验、被动膝关节伸展(PKE)试验的腘窝角和触趾试验(TT)。
第1组与第2组有显著结果(P < 0.05):(1)SLR,右侧 -5.5度;(2)PKE,右侧 +10.2度,左侧 +6.2度;(3)临床相关参数值范围(RVCRP):相对危险度(RR),0.35至0.38;相对危险度降低(RRR),0.62至0.65;绝对危险度降低(ARR),0.32至0.39;需治疗人数(NNT),3至4。第1组与第3组:(1)SLR,右侧 -12.3度,左侧 -10度;(2)PKE,右侧 +12.9度,左侧 +8.5度;(3)TT, -8.9厘米;(4)RVCRP:RR,0.12至0.28;RRR,0.72至0.88;ARR,0.60至0.83;NNT,2至2。第2组与第3组:(1)SLR,右侧 -6.8度,左侧 -6.2度;(2)TT, -6.7厘米;(3)RVCRP:RR,0.44至0.53;RRR,0.47至0.56;ARR,0.40至0.56;NNT,2至3。
拉伸 + 经皮电刺激神经疗法比单独的AS能产生更大改善,且两者均优于传统拉伸。
电刺激与AS相结合的方法是一种适用于常规临床实践的相关技术,应系统地应用于10至16岁患有SHS的足球运动员儿童。