Okunieff P, Zietman A, Kahn J, Singer S, Neuringer L J, Levine R A, Evans F E
Department of Radiation Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114.
N Engl J Med. 1990 Apr 5;322(14):953-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199004053221403.
Water-suppressed proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy of plasma has been proposed by Fossel et al. (N Engl J Med 1986; 315:1369-76) as a technique for detecting malignant tumors. In their analysis, plasma samples from patients with cancer were clearly distinguished from those of normal subjects by measuring and averaging the methyl and methylene line widths of plasma lipoproteins in NMR spectrums. To evaluate this diagnostic procedure further, we collected and analyzed by NMR spectroscopy 145 samples of plasma from patients who served as controls, most of whom were undergoing orthopedic or cardiac surgery (n = 66); patients with a variety of untreated malignant tumors (n = 25) or treated malignant tumors (n = 18); and patients with hyperplastic or "premalignant" diseases, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia and ulcerative colitis (n = 36). All the samples were coded, and NMR spectroscopy was performed without knowledge of the patients' clinical status. There were no significant differences in the NMR line widths among the four study groups (P greater than 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). The specificity and sensitivity of this method for distinguishing the control patients (mean line width [+/- SD], 44.0 +/- 7.4 Hz) from those with untreated cancer (43.8 +/- 6.9 Hz) were poor, with a false positive rate of 52 percent (34 of 66) and a false negative rate of 56 percent (14 of 25). Inverse correlations of line widths with age (P less than 0.01) and with the plasma triglyceride level (P less than 0.001) were detected. We conclude that NMR spectroscopy of plasma is not an accurate test for the detection of malignant tumors.
福塞尔等人(《新英格兰医学杂志》1986年;315:1369 - 1376)提出,血浆的水抑制质子核磁共振(NMR)光谱法可作为检测恶性肿瘤的一项技术。在他们的分析中,通过测量和平均NMR光谱中血浆脂蛋白的甲基和亚甲基线宽,癌症患者的血浆样本与正常受试者的血浆样本得以清晰区分。为进一步评估这一诊断程序,我们收集了145份血浆样本,并通过NMR光谱法进行分析。这些样本来自对照组患者,其中大多数正在接受骨科或心脏手术(n = 66);患有各种未治疗恶性肿瘤的患者(n = 25)或已治疗恶性肿瘤的患者(n = 18);以及患有增生性或“癌前”疾病的患者,如良性前列腺增生和溃疡性结肠炎(n = 36)。所有样本均进行了编码,且在不知患者临床状况的情况下进行了NMR光谱分析。四个研究组之间的NMR线宽无显著差异(所有两两比较的P值均大于0.05)。该方法区分对照组患者(平均线宽[±标准差],44.0±7.4 Hz)与未治疗癌症患者(43.8±6.9 Hz)的特异性和敏感性较差,假阳性率为52%(66例中的34例),假阴性率为56%(25例中的14例)。检测到线宽与年龄(P < 0.01)和血浆甘油三酯水平(P < 0.001)呈负相关。我们得出结论,血浆的NMR光谱法并非检测恶性肿瘤的准确方法。