Chair of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Curr Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(5):e343-52. doi: 10.3747/co.19.1016.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (mbsr) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (mbct) in patients with breast cancer.
The medline, Cochrane Library, embase, cambase, and PsycInfo databases were screened through November 2011. The search strategy combined keywords for mbsr and mbct with keywords for breast cancer. Randomized controlled trials (rcts) comparing mbsr or mbct with control conditions in patients with breast cancer were included. Two authors independently used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess risk of bias in the selected studies. Study characteristics and outcomes were extracted by two authors independently. Primary outcome measures were health-related quality of life and psychological health. If at least two studies assessing an outcome were available, standardized mean differences (smds) and 95% confidence intervals (cis) were calculated for that outcome. As a measure of heterogeneity, I(2) was calculated.
Three rcts with a total of 327 subjects were included. One rct compared mbsr with usual care, one rct compared mbsr with free-choice stress management, and a three-arm rct compared mbsr with usual care and with nutrition education. Compared with usual care, mbsr was superior in decreasing depression (smd: -0.37; 95% ci: -0.65 to -0.08; p = 0.01; I(2) = 0%) and anxiety (smd: -0.51; 95% ci: -0.80 to -0.21; p = 0.0009; I(2) = 0%), but not in increasing spirituality (smd: 0.27; 95% ci: -0.37 to 0.91; p = 0.41; I(2) = 79%).
There is some evidence for the effectiveness of mbsr in improving psychological health in breast cancer patients, but more rcts are needed to underpin those results.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估基于正念的减压(MBSR)和基于正念的认知疗法(MBCT)在乳腺癌患者中的有效性。
通过 2011 年 11 月筛选了 Medline、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、Cambase 和 PsycInfo 数据库。搜索策略结合了 MBSR 和 MBCT 的关键词以及乳腺癌的关键词。纳入了比较 MBSR 或 MBCT 与乳腺癌患者对照条件的随机对照试验(RCT)。两位作者独立使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估所选研究的偏倚风险。两位作者独立提取研究特征和结局。主要结局指标为健康相关生活质量和心理健康。如果至少有两项评估某一结局的研究可用,则计算该结局的标准化均数差(SMD)和 95%置信区间(CI)。作为异质性的衡量标准,计算了 I(2)。
纳入了三项 RCT,共 327 例患者。一项 RCT 比较了 MBSR 与常规护理,一项 RCT 比较了 MBSR 与自由选择的应激管理,一项三臂 RCT 比较了 MBSR 与常规护理和营养教育。与常规护理相比,MBSR 在降低抑郁(SMD:-0.37;95%CI:-0.65 至-0.08;p=0.01;I(2)=0%)和焦虑(SMD:-0.51;95%CI:-0.80 至-0.21;p=0.0009;I(2)=0%)方面更优,但在提高精神性方面(SMD:0.27;95%CI:-0.37 至 0.91;p=0.41;I(2)=79%)并无优势。
有一些证据表明 MBSR 可改善乳腺癌患者的心理健康,但还需要更多的 RCT 来支持这些结果。