IRIS Group, Centre d'Etudes SensoriMotrices UMR8194, CNRS, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e46739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046739. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
There is controversy as to whether dyslexic children present systematic postural deficiency. Clinicians use a combination of ophthalmic prisms and proprioceptive soles to improve postural performances. This study examines the effects of convergent prisms and spherical lenses on posture. Fourteen dyslexics (13-17 years-old) and 11 non dyslexics (13-16 years-old) participated in the study. Quiet stance posturography was performed with the TechnoConcept device while subjects fixated a target at eye-level from a distance of 1_m. Four conditions were run: normal viewing; viewing the target with spherical lenses of -1 diopter (ACCOM1) over each eye; viewing with -3 diopters over each eye (ACCOM3); viewing with a convergent prism of 8 diopters per eye. Relative to normal viewing, the -1 lenses increased the surface of body sway significantly whereas the -3 diopter lenses only resulted in a significant increase of antero-posterior body sway. Thus, adolescents would appear to cope more effectively with stronger conflicts rather than subtle ones. The prism condition resulted in a significant increase in both the surface and the antero-posterior body sway. Importantly, all of these effects were similar for the two groups. Wavelet analysis (time frequency domain) revealed high spectral power of antero-posterior sway for the prism condition in both groups. In the ACCOM3 condition, the spectral power of antero-posterior sway decreased for non dyslexics but increased for dyslexics suggesting that dyslexics encounter more difficulty with accommodation. The cancelling time for medium range frequency (believed to be controlled by the cerebellum), was shorter in dyslexics, suggesting fewer instances of optimal control. We conclude that dyslexics achieve similar postural performances albeit less efficiently. Prisms and lenses destabilize posture for all teenagers. Thus, contrary to adults, adolescents do not seem to use efferent, proprioceptive ocular motor signals to improve their posture, at least not immediately when confronted to convergence accommodation conflict.
对于阅读障碍儿童是否存在系统性姿势缺陷,存在争议。临床医生使用组合的眼科棱镜和本体感觉鞋底来改善姿势表现。本研究检查了收敛棱镜和球形透镜对姿势的影响。 14 名阅读障碍儿童(13-17 岁)和 11 名非阅读障碍儿童(13-16 岁)参加了这项研究。在距离 1 米处的水平目标固定注视的情况下,使用 TechnoConcept 设备进行安静站立姿势描记术。进行了四种条件的测试:正常观察;用双眼每只眼加-1 屈光度的球形透镜(ACCOM1)观察;每只眼加-3 屈光度的球形透镜(ACCOM3)观察;用每只眼 8 屈光度的会聚棱镜观察。与正常观察相比,-1 屈光度的透镜显著增加了身体晃动的表面,而-3 屈光度的透镜仅导致前后身体晃动的显著增加。因此,青少年似乎能够更有效地应对更强的冲突,而不是细微的冲突。棱镜条件导致身体晃动的表面和前后两个方向都显著增加。重要的是,两组的这些效果都相似。小波分析(时频域)显示,两组棱镜条件下前后摆动的频谱功率都很高。在 ACCOM3 条件下,非阅读障碍者的前后摆动频谱功率降低,但阅读障碍者的频谱功率增加,这表明阅读障碍者在适应方面遇到更多困难。中程频率(被认为受小脑控制)的消除时间在阅读障碍者中较短,这表明最佳控制的情况较少。我们得出的结论是,阅读障碍者尽管效率较低,但仍能达到相似的姿势表现。棱镜和透镜会使所有青少年的姿势不稳定。因此,与成年人相反,青少年似乎不会立即使用传出的本体感觉眼球运动信号来改善姿势,至少在面对会聚适应冲突时不会。