Comparing the retrospective reports of fatigue using the Fatigue Symptom Index with daily diary ratings in women receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic cancer.

CONTEXT

Fatigue, one of the most common side effects of chemotherapy, is typically assessed via retrospective recall (e.g., over the past week). It is unknown how such retrospective recall of fatigue correlates with daily ratings among people receiving chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

The current study compared fatigue recorded in daily diaries with retrospective ratings using the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic cancer.

METHODS

During the week before and the week after their first infusion of chemotherapy, patients completed daily diaries at 10 AM, 2, and 6 PM and the FSI at the end of each week.

RESULTS

FSI and diary ratings of peak, lowest, and average fatigue were significantly correlated (P < 0.001). When peak, end, average, and variance diary ratings were regressed separately on the average FSI item, each was significant pre-chemotherapy (P < 0.01) and post-chemotherapy (P < 0.05). However, when entered into a stepwise regression model, only the average fatigue diary rating was retained, explaining 52% of the variance pre-chemotherapy and 54% of the variance post-chemotherapy average FSI item (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The FSI keyed to the past week accurately reflects daily ratings of fatigue among patients receiving chemotherapy. This study has important implications, as completing retrospective ratings of fatigue may be less burdensome for cancer patients than daily assessments.