Clinical and Research Programs in Pediatric Psychopharmacology and Adult ADHD, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
J Affect Disord. 2013 May;147(1-3):164-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.10.028. Epub 2012 Nov 17.
Although the DSM-IV provides explicit criteria for the diagnosis of BP-I disorder, this is a complex diagnosis that requires high levels of clinical expertise. Previous work shows children with a unique profile of the CBCL of high scores (2SD) on the attention problems (AP), aggressive behavior (AGG), and anxious-depressed (AD) (A-A-A) subscales are more likely than other children to meet criteria for BP-I disorder in both epidemiological and clinical samples. However, since not all BP-I disorder children have a positive profile questions remain as to its informativeness, particularly in the absence of an expert diagnostician.
Analyses were conducted comparing personal and familial correlates of BP-I disorder in 140 youth with a structured interview and an expert clinician based DSM-IV diagnosis of BP-I disorder with (N=80) and without (N=60) a positive CBCL- Severe Dysregulation profile, and 129 controls of similar age and sex without ADHD or a mood disorder. Subjects were comprehensively assessed with structured diagnostic interviews and wide range of functional measures. We defined the CBCL-severe dysregulation profile as an aggregate cut-off score of ≥ 210 on the A-A-A scales.
BP-I probands with and without a positive CBCL-severe dysregulation profile significantly differed from Controls in patterns of psychiatric comorbidity, psychosocial and psychoeducational dysfunction, and cognitive deficits, as well as in their risk for BP-I disorder in first degree relatives.
Because the sample was referred and largely Caucasian, findings may not generalize to community samples and other ethnic groups.
A positive CBCL-severe dysregulation profile identifies a severe subgroup of BP-I disorder youth.
尽管 DSM-IV 为 BP-I 障碍的诊断提供了明确的标准,但这是一个复杂的诊断,需要高水平的临床专业知识。先前的研究表明,在 CBCL 中,具有注意力问题(AP)、攻击性行为(AGG)和焦虑抑郁(AD)高分(2SD)独特模式的儿童比其他儿童更有可能在流行病学和临床样本中符合 BP-I 障碍的标准。然而,由于并非所有 BP-I 障碍儿童都具有阳性特征,因此其信息性仍存在疑问,特别是在没有专家诊断师的情况下。
通过对 140 名青少年进行结构访谈和基于 DSM-IV 的专家临床诊断,对 BP-I 障碍的个人和家族相关性进行了分析,其中包括(N=80)和不包括(N=60)阳性 CBCL-严重失调特征的 BP-I 障碍患者,以及年龄和性别与 ADHD 或心境障碍相似的 129 名对照组。对受试者进行了全面的评估,包括结构化诊断访谈和广泛的功能评估。我们将 CBCL-严重失调特征定义为 A-A-A 量表的总分≥210。
具有和不具有阳性 CBCL-严重失调特征的 BP-I 患者与对照组在精神共病模式、心理社会和心理教育功能障碍以及认知缺陷方面存在显著差异,并且一级亲属中 BP-I 障碍的风险也存在差异。
由于样本是经转诊的,且主要是白种人,因此研究结果可能不适用于社区样本和其他种族群体。
阳性 CBCL-严重失调特征可识别出 BP-I 障碍青少年的严重亚组。