Suppr超能文献

一份多领域共同养育自我报告量表。

A Multi-Domain Self-Report Measure of Coparenting.

作者信息

Feinberg Mark E, Brown Louis D, Kan Marni L

机构信息

Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, Marion Suite 402, University Park, PA 16801.

出版信息

Parent Sci Pract. 2012 Jan 1;12(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2012.638870. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study reports the psychometric properties of a multi-domain measure of the coparenting relationship in dual-parent families. METHOD: 152 couples participating in a transition to parenthood study completed the Coparenting Relationship Scale and additional measures during home visits at child age 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years. RESULTS: Psychometric and construct validity assessments indicated the measure performed satisfactorily. The 35-item measure demonstrated good reliability and strong stability. Subscales measuring theoretically and empirically important aspects of coparenting (coparenting agreement, coparenting closeness, exposure of child to conflict, coparenting support, coparenting undermining, endorsement of partner's parenting, and division of labor) demonstrated good reliability as well. A 14-item brief overall measure showed very strong associations with the overall measure. Relations of the full scale with a measure of social desirability were weak, and the full scale was positively associated with positive dimensions of the dyadic couple relationship (love, sex/romance, couple efficacy) and inversely associated with negative dimensions (conflict, ineffective arguing)-as expected. CONCLUSIONS: This initial examination of the Coparenting Relationship Scale suggests that it possesses good psychometric properties (reliability, stability, construct validity, and inter-rater agreement), can be flexibly administered in short and long forms, and is positioned to promote further conceptual and methodological progress in the study of coparenting.

摘要

目的

本研究报告了双亲家庭中共同养育关系多领域测量工具的心理测量特性。方法:152对参与为人父母过渡研究的夫妇在孩子6个月、1岁和3岁时的家访中完成了共同养育关系量表及其他测量。结果:心理测量和结构效度评估表明该测量工具表现令人满意。这个包含35个条目的测量工具显示出良好的信度和较强的稳定性。测量共同养育在理论和实证方面重要方面的分量表(共同养育一致性、共同养育亲密度、孩子接触冲突的情况、共同养育支持、共同养育破坏、对伴侣养育方式的认可以及分工)也显示出良好的信度。一个包含14个条目的简短整体测量与整体测量显示出非常强的相关性。完整量表与社会赞许性测量的关系较弱,并且完整量表与二元夫妻关系的积极维度(爱、性/浪漫、夫妻效能)呈正相关,与消极维度(冲突、无效争吵)呈负相关——正如预期的那样。结论:对共同养育关系量表的这一初步检验表明,它具有良好的心理测量特性(信度、稳定性、结构效度和评分者间一致性),可以灵活地以简短和长版形式施测,并且有望在共同养育研究中推动进一步的概念和方法进展。

相似文献

1
A Multi-Domain Self-Report Measure of Coparenting.
Parent Sci Pract. 2012 Jan 1;12(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2012.638870. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
2
3
Couple, Parent, and Infant Characteristics and Perceptions of Conflictual Coparenting over the Transition to Parenthood.
J Soc Pers Relat. 2022 Apr;39(4):908-930. doi: 10.1177/02654075211048954. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
5
Cross-day influences between couple closeness and coparenting support among new parents.
J Fam Psychol. 2019 Apr;33(3):360-369. doi: 10.1037/fam0000489. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
6
Measurement invariance of the Coparenting Relationship Scale (CRS) across 10 countries.
J Fam Psychol. 2024 Aug;38(5):697-706. doi: 10.1037/fam0001228. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
7
Variation in coparenting quality in relation to child age: Links to coparents' relationship satisfaction and education.
Scand J Psychol. 2023 Oct;64(5):632-643. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12915. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
8
Development of a Brief Coparenting Measure: The Coparenting Competence Scale.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 7;20(13):6322. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20136322.
9
New Fathers' Perceptions of Dyadic Adjustment: The Roles of Maternal Gatekeeping and Coparenting Closeness.
Fam Process. 2020 Jun;59(2):571-585. doi: 10.1111/famp.12451. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
10
Self-perceived Coparenting of Nonresident Fathers: Scale Development and Validation.
Fam Process. 2018 Dec;57(4):927-946. doi: 10.1111/famp.12331. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

3
Psychometric Properties of the Coparenting Relationship Scale in Ecuadorian Parents.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Jun 25;15(7):117. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15070117.
6
How Do We Live Together During a Lockdown in Belgium? Study of Couple and Parental Satisfaction.
Trends Psychol. 2022 Feb 2:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s43076-022-00146-x.
7
When do parents use positive behavior support? Day-to-day fluctuations in parental moods and coparenting support.
J Fam Psychol. 2025 Sep;39(6):873-884. doi: 10.1037/fam0001352. Epub 2025 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Observed and Reported Supportive Coparenting as Predictors of Infant-Mother and Infant-Father Attachment Security.
Early Child Dev Care. 2010;180(1-2):121-137. doi: 10.1080/03004430903415015.
2
The Internal Structure and Ecological Context of Coparenting: A Framework for Research and Intervention.
Parent Sci Pract. 2003 Jan 1;3(2):95-131. doi: 10.1207/S15327922PAR0302_01.
3
The Longitudinal Influence of Coparenting Conflict on Parental Negativity and Adolescent Maladjustment.
J Marriage Fam. 2007 Aug 1;69(3):687-702. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00400.x.
4
Effects of family foundations on parents and children: 3.5 years after baseline.
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Oct;24(5):532-42. doi: 10.1037/a0020837.
8
Maternal gatekeeping, coparenting quality, and fathering behavior in families with infants.
J Fam Psychol. 2008 Jun;22(3):389-98. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.389.
10
Parenting, coparenting, and effortful control in preschoolers.
J Fam Psychol. 2008 Feb;22(1):30-40. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验