Health Policy Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049890. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
We examined whether state laws and district policies pertaining to nutritional restrictions on school fundraisers were associated with school policies as reported by administrators in a nationally-representative sample of United States public elementary schools.
We gathered data on school-level fundraising policies via a mail-back survey during the 2009-10 and 2010-11 school years. Surveys were received from 1,278 public elementary schools (response rate = 60.9%). Data were also gathered on corresponding school district policies and state laws. After removing cases with missing data, the sample size for analysis was 1,215 schools.
After controlling for school characteristics, school policies were consistently associated with state laws and district policies, both those pertaining to fundraising generally, as well as specific restrictions on the sale of candy and soda in fundraisers (all Odds Ratios >2.0 and Ps<.05). However, even where district policies and state laws required fundraising restrictions, school policies were not uniformly present; school policies were also in place at only 55.8% of these schools, but were more common at schools in the West (77.1%) and at majority-Latino schools (71.4%), indicating uneven school-level implementation of district policy and state law.
District policies and state laws were associated with a higher prevalence of elementary school-level fundraising policies, but many schools that were subject to district policies and state laws did not have school-level restrictions in place, suggesting the need for further attention to factors hindering policy implementation in schools.
我们研究了与学校营养限制有关的州法律和地区政策是否与美国公立小学的管理人员报告的学校政策相关。
我们通过 2009-10 年和 2010-11 年学年间的邮件回寄调查收集了学校层面筹款政策的数据。调查收到了 1278 所公立小学(回复率=60.9%)的数据。还收集了相应的学区政策和州法律的数据。在去除缺失数据的案例后,分析样本量为 1215 所学校。
在控制学校特征后,学校政策始终与州法律和地区政策相关,包括一般筹款以及在筹款活动中对糖果和苏打水销售的具体限制(所有优势比>2.0,P<.05)。然而,即使在地区政策和州法律要求筹款限制的情况下,学校政策也不是普遍存在的;在这些学校中,只有 55.8%的学校有学校政策,而且在西部学校(77.1%)和以拉丁裔为主的学校(71.4%)更为常见,这表明地区政策和州法律在学校层面的执行存在不平衡。
地区政策和州法律与小学层面筹款政策的高流行率相关,但许多受到地区政策和州法律约束的学校没有在学校层面实施限制,这表明需要进一步关注阻碍学校政策执行的因素。