Kubik Martha Y, Wall Melanie, Shen Lijuan, Nanney Marilyn S, Nelson Toben F, Laska Melissa N, Story Mary
School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, 308 Harvard St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Jul;110(7):1043-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.04.008.
Policy that targets the school food environment has been advanced as one way to increase the availability of healthy food at schools and healthy food choice by students. Although both state- and district-level policy initiatives have focused on school nutrition standards, it remains to be seen whether these policies translate into healthy food practices at the school level, where student behavior will be impacted.
To examine whether state- and district-level nutrition policies addressing junk food in school vending machines and school stores were associated with less junk food in school vending machines and school stores. Junk food was defined as foods and beverages with low nutrient density that provide calories primarily through fats and added sugars.
A cross-sectional study design was used to assess self-report data collected by computer-assisted telephone interviews or self-administered mail questionnaires from state-, district-, and school-level respondents participating in the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006. The School Health Policies and Programs Study, administered every 6 years since 1994 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is considered the largest, most comprehensive assessment of school health policies and programs in the United States.
SUBJECTS/SETTING: A nationally representative sample (n=563) of public elementary, middle, and high schools was studied.
Logistic regression adjusted for school characteristics, sampling weights, and clustering was used to analyze data. Policies were assessed for strength (required, recommended, neither required nor recommended prohibiting junk food) and whether strength was similar for school vending machines and school stores.
School vending machines and school stores were more prevalent in high schools (93%) than middle (84%) and elementary (30%) schools. For state policies, elementary schools that required prohibiting junk food in school vending machines and school stores offered less junk food than elementary schools that neither required nor recommended prohibiting junk food (13% vs 37%; P=0.006). Middle schools that required prohibiting junk food in vending machines and school stores offered less junk food than middle schools that recommended prohibiting junk food (71% vs 87%; P=0.07). Similar associations were not evident for district-level polices or high schools.
Policy may be an effective tool to decrease junk food in schools, particularly in elementary and middle schools.
旨在改善学校饮食环境的政策已被视为增加学校健康食品供应以及促使学生选择健康食品的一种方式。尽管州和地区层面的政策举措都聚焦于学校营养标准,但这些政策能否在学校层面转化为健康的食品实践,进而影响学生行为,仍有待观察。
探讨州和地区层面针对学校自动售货机和校内商店垃圾食品的营养政策,是否与学校自动售货机和校内商店中垃圾食品减少有关。垃圾食品定义为营养密度低、主要通过脂肪和添加糖提供热量的食品和饮料。
采用横断面研究设计,评估通过计算机辅助电话访谈或自行填写邮寄问卷收集的自我报告数据,这些数据来自参与2006年学校健康政策与项目研究的州、地区和学校层面的受访者。自1994年以来,美国疾病控制与预防中心每6年开展一次学校健康政策与项目研究,该研究被认为是美国对学校健康政策与项目规模最大、最全面的评估。
研究对象/场所:对全国范围内具有代表性的563所公立小学、初中和高中进行了研究。
采用经学校特征、抽样权重和聚类调整的逻辑回归分析数据。评估政策的力度(要求、建议、既不要求也不建议禁止垃圾食品)以及学校自动售货机和校内商店的政策力度是否相似。
学校自动售货机和校内商店在高中(93%)比初中(84%)和小学(30%)更为普遍。对于州政策,要求禁止学校自动售货机和校内商店销售垃圾食品的小学,其提供的垃圾食品比既不要求也不建议禁止销售垃圾食品的小学少(13%对37%;P = 0.006)。要求禁止自动售货机和校内商店销售垃圾食品的初中,其提供的垃圾食品比建议禁止销售垃圾食品的初中少(71%对87%;P = 0.07)。对于地区层面的政策或高中,类似的关联并不明显。
政策可能是减少学校垃圾食品的有效工具,尤其是在小学和初中。