Suppr超能文献

比较胃癌患者术中及腹腔内化疗的不同方法:一项荟萃分析。

Comparison different methods of intraoperative and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Huang Jin-Yu, Xu Ying-Ying, Sun Zhe, Zhu Zhi, Song Yong-Xi, Guo Peng-Tao, You Yi, Xu Hui-Mian

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(9):4379-85. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.9.4379.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) for patients with gastric cancer and to compare effects between different regimens of IPC.

METHOD

Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of surgery plus intraperitoneal chemotherapy with surgery alone or comparing the efficacy between different regimens of intraperitoneal chemotherapy were searched for in Medline, Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Library and the Chinese BioMedical Disc and so on by two independent reviewers. After quality assessment and data extraction, data were pooled for meta-analysis using RevMan5.16 software. Tests of interaction were used to test for differences of effects among subgroups grouped according to different IPC regimens.

RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs with a total of 1713 patients with gastric cancer were included for quality assessment and data extraction. Ten studies were judged to be of fair quality and entered into meta-analysis. Hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HR=0.60, P<0.01), hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy plus postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HR=0.47, P<0.01) and normothermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HR=0.70, P=0.01) were associated with a significant improvement in overall survival. Tests of interaction showed that hyperthermia and additional postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy did not impact on its effect. Further analysis revealed that intraperitoneal chemotherapy remarkably decrease the rate of postoperative hepatic metastasis by 73% (OR=0.27, 95% CI=0.12 to 0.67, P<0.01). However, intraperitoneal chemotherapy increased risks of marrow depression (OR=5.74, P<0.01), fever (OR=3.67, P=0.02) and intra-abdominal abscess (OR=3.57, P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis demonstrates that hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy and normothermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy should be recommended to treat patients with gastric cancer because of improvement in overall survival. However, it is noteworthy that intraperitoneal chemotherapy can increase the risks of marrow depression, intra-abdominal abscesses, and fever.

摘要

目的

探讨腹腔内化疗(IPC)治疗胃癌患者的疗效和安全性,并比较不同IPC方案之间的效果。

方法

由两名独立评审员在Medline、Embase、Pubmed、Cochrane图书馆和中国生物医学文献数据库等中检索比较手术加腹腔内化疗与单纯手术效果或比较不同腹腔内化疗方案疗效的随机对照试验。经过质量评估和数据提取后,使用RevMan5.16软件对数据进行汇总以进行荟萃分析。交互作用检验用于检验根据不同IPC方案分组的亚组之间的效果差异。

结果

纳入15项随机对照试验,共1713例胃癌患者进行质量评估和数据提取。10项研究被判定质量一般并纳入荟萃分析。术中热灌注腹腔内化疗(HR=0.60,P<0.01)、术中热灌注腹腔内化疗加术后腹腔内化疗(HR=0.47,P<0.01)和术中常温腹腔内化疗(HR=0.70,P=0.01)与总生存期的显著改善相关。交互作用检验表明热疗和额外的术后腹腔内化疗不影响其效果。进一步分析显示,腹腔内化疗可使术后肝转移率显著降低73%(OR=0.27,95%CI=0.12至0.67,P<0.01)。然而,腹腔内化疗增加了骨髓抑制(OR=5.74,P<0.01)、发热(OR=3.67,P=0.02)和腹腔内脓肿(OR=3.57,P<0.01)的风险。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,由于总生存期得到改善,术中热灌注腹腔内化疗和术中常温腹腔内化疗应推荐用于治疗胃癌患者。然而,值得注意的是,腹腔内化疗会增加骨髓抑制、腹腔内脓肿和发热的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验