Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Institute for Practical Ethics and Public Life, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):4-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31824acb25.
As public health departments around the country undergo accreditation using the Public Health Accreditation Board standards, the process provides a new opportunity to integrate ethics metrics into day-to-day public health practice. While the accreditation standards do not explicitly address ethics, ethical tools and considerations can enrich the accreditation process by helping health departments and their communities understand what ethical principles underlie the accreditation standards and how to use metrics based on these ethical principles to support decision making in public health practice. We provide a crosswalk between a public health essential service, Public Health Accreditation Board community engagement domain standards, and the relevant ethical principles in the Public Health Code of Ethics (Code). A case study illustrates how the accreditation standards and the ethical principles in the Code together can enhance the practice of engaging the community in decision making in the local health department.
随着全国公共卫生部门使用公共卫生认证委员会标准进行认证,这一过程为将道德计量标准纳入日常公共卫生实践提供了新的机会。虽然认证标准并未明确涉及道德问题,但道德工具和考虑因素可以通过帮助卫生部门及其社区了解认证标准所依据的道德原则以及如何使用基于这些道德原则的指标来支持公共卫生实践中的决策,从而丰富认证过程。我们提供了公共卫生基本服务、公共卫生认证委员会社区参与领域标准以及《公共卫生道德规范》(Code)中相关道德原则之间的对应关系。一个案例研究说明了认证标准和《规范》中的道德原则如何共同增强地方卫生部门在社区参与决策方面的实践。