Li Sheng, Zeng Xian-Tao, Ruan Xiao-Lan, Wang Xing-Huan, Guo Yi, Yang Zhong-Hua
Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071;
Exp Ther Med. 2012 Oct;4(4):685-692. doi: 10.3892/etm.2012.660. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the recurrence rate of simultaneous transurethral resection of bladder cancer and prostate (TURBT+TURP) in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE and the ISI Web of Knowledge databases from their establishment until March 2012, to collect all the original studies on TURBT+TURP vs. TURBT alone in the treatment of NMIBC with BPH. After screening the literature, methodological quality assessment and data extraction was conducted independently by two reviewers and meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.1 software. The quality of data was assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Eight studies, including seven non-randomized concurrent controlled trials (NRCCTs) and one randomized controlled trial (RCT), involving a total of 1,372 patients met the criteria. Meta-analyses of NRCCTs showed that in the TURBT+TURP group, overall recurrence rates were lower [odds ratio (OR), 0.76; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60-0.96; P=0.02] and the difference was statistically significant. The postoperative recurrence rate in the prostatic fossa/bladder neck (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.64-1.45; P=0.86) and bladder tumor progression rates (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.49-1.87; P=0.91) were similar between the TURBT+TURP and TURBT groups, but the difference was not significant. According to the GRADE approach, the level of evidence was moderate or low. Only one RCT demonstrated that overall postoperative tumor recurrence rates, recurrence rates at prostate fossa/bladder neck and bladder tumor progression rates between simultaneous groups and control groups were almost equal. There was no significant difference (P>0.05), and the level of evidence was moderate. For patients with NMIBC and BPH, simultaneous resection did not increase the overall recurrence rate of bladder tumors, it also did not cause metastasis and tumor progression, but it may reduce the recurrence rate. However, due to the low quality of investigations included in the present study, careful selection was necessary, and more large-scale and high-quality randomized controlled trials are also required for further confirmation.
本研究旨在评估经尿道同时切除膀胱癌和前列腺(TURBT+TURP)治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)合并良性前列腺增生(BPH)的复发率。我们检索了PubMed、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、EMBASE和ISI Web of Knowledge数据库,检索时间从建库至2012年3月,以收集所有关于TURBT+TURP与单纯TURBT治疗NMIBC合并BPH的原始研究。在筛选文献后,由两名评价者独立进行方法学质量评估和数据提取,并使用RevMan 5.1软件进行荟萃分析。采用推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法评估数据质量。八项研究符合标准,其中包括七项非随机同期对照试验(NRCCT)和一项随机对照试验(RCT),共纳入1372例患者。NRCCT的荟萃分析显示,在TURBT+TURP组中,总体复发率较低[比值比(OR),0.76;95%置信区间(CI),0.60-0.96;P=0.02],差异具有统计学意义。TURBT+TURP组与TURBT组在前列腺窝/膀胱颈的术后复发率(OR,0.96;95%CI,0.64-1.45;P=0.86)和膀胱肿瘤进展率(OR,0.96;95%CI,0.49-1.87;P=0.91)相似,但差异无统计学意义。根据GRADE方法,证据级别为中等或低等。仅一项RCT表明,同期手术组与对照组之间的总体术后肿瘤复发率、前列腺窝/膀胱颈复发率和膀胱肿瘤进展率几乎相等。差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),证据级别为中等。对于NMIBC合并BPH的患者,同期切除不会增加膀胱肿瘤的总体复发率,也不会导致转移和肿瘤进展,但可能降低复发率。然而,由于本研究纳入的调查质量较低,有必要谨慎选择,还需要更多大规模、高质量的随机对照试验进行进一步证实。