Suppr超能文献

开放性手术与胸腔镜手术修复食管闭锁合并气管食管瘘的临床结局比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Comparison of clinical outcomes between open and thoracoscopic repair for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wu Yuhao, Kuang Hongyu, Lv Tiewei, Wu Chun

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 136 Zhongshan Second Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.

Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, 400014, China.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 Nov;33(11):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s00383-017-4153-9. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A meta-analysis was performed for a comparison of outcomes between open repair (OR) and thoracoscopic repair (TR) for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA with TEF).

METHODS

Electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Medline, were searched systematically for the literatures aimed mainly at comparing the therapeutic effects for EA with TEF administrated by OR and TR. Corresponding data sets were extracted and two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality. Meta-analysis was performed with Stata 12.0.

RESULTS

Ten studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included, involving 447 subjects in total. It was observed that OR entailed a shorter operative time with significant statistical differences (SMD 0.604; 95% CI 0.344-0.864, P = 0). While TR was superior in two aspects: shorter length of hospital stay (SMD 0.584; 95% CI 0.214-0.953; P = 0.002) and shorter first oral feeding time (SMD 0.652; 95% CI 0.27-1.035; P = 0.001). However, meta-analyses of occurrence rate of leaks (OR, 1.747; 95% CI 0.817-3.737; P = 0.15), strictures (OR, 0.937; 95% CI 0.5-1.757; P = 0.839), pulmonary complications (OR, 1.08; 95% CI 0.21-5.44; P = 0.897), fundoplication rate of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) (OR, 1.642; 95% CI 0.855-3.153; P = 0.601), and blood loss (SMD 0.048; 95% CI -1.292 to 1.388; P = 0.944) showed no significant differences between OR and TR. Meta-analysis of ventilation time showed similar outcome between OR and TR (SMD 0.474; 95% CI 0.02-0.968; P = 0.06), but the result remained controversial due to estimated result changing after sensitivity analysis (SMD 0.61; 95% CI 0.16-1.07; P = 0).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with OR, a longer operative time was associated within TR group, although the TR procedure could possibly reduce the length of hospital stay and first oral feeding time. Meanwhile, the occurrence rate for leaks, strictures, pulmonary complications, and the fundoplication rate of GERD, and blood loss were similar between the OR and TR groups. Estimated result of ventilation time between the two groups remained ambiguous.

摘要

目的

对食管闭锁合并气管食管瘘(EA 合并 TEF)的开放修复术(OR)和胸腔镜修复术(TR)的治疗效果进行荟萃分析比较。

方法

系统检索电子数据库,包括 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Medline,以查找主要比较 OR 和 TR 治疗 EA 合并 TEF 疗效的文献。提取相应数据集,两名审阅者独立评估方法学质量。使用 Stata 12.0 进行荟萃分析。

结果

纳入 10 项符合纳入标准的研究,共涉及 447 名受试者。结果显示,OR 的手术时间较短,差异有统计学意义(标准化均数差[SMD]0.604;95%置信区间[CI]0.344 - 0.864,P = 0)。而 TR 在两个方面更具优势:住院时间较短(SMD 0.584;95%CI 0.214 - 0.953;P = 0.002)和首次经口喂养时间较短(SMD 0.652;95%CI 0.27 - 1.035;P = 0.001)。然而,瘘发生率(OR,1.747;95%CI 0.817 - 3.737;P = 0.15)、狭窄发生率(OR,0.937;95%CI 0.5 - 1.757;P = 0.839)、肺部并发症发生率(OR,1.08;95%CI 0.21 - 5.44;P = 0.897)、胃食管反流病(GERD)的胃底折叠术发生率(OR,1.642;95%CI 0.855 - 3.153;P = 0.601)以及失血量(SMD 0.048;95%CI -1.292 至 1.388;P = 0.944)的荟萃分析显示,OR 和 TR 之间无显著差异。通气时间的荟萃分析显示,OR 和 TR 的结果相似(SMD 0.474;95%CI 0.02 - 0.968;P = 0.06),但由于敏感性分析后估计结果发生变化(SMD 0.61;95%CI 0.16 - 1.07;P = 0),结果仍存在争议。

结论

与 OR 相比,TR 组的手术时间较长,尽管 TR 手术可能会缩短住院时间和首次经口喂养时间。同时,OR 组和 TR 组在瘘发生率、狭窄发生率、肺部并发症发生率、GERD 的胃底折叠术发生率以及失血量方面相似。两组通气时间的估计结果仍不明确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验