Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Psychol Med. 2013 Aug;43(8):1673-83. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712002292. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
Dimensional models of co-morbidity have the potential to improve the conceptualization of mental disorders in research and clinical work, yet little is known about how relatively uncommon disorders may fit with more common disorders. The present study estimated the meta-structure of psychopathology in the US general population focusing on the placement of five under-studied disorders sharing features of thought disorder: paranoid, schizoid, avoidant and schizotypal personality disorders, and manic episodes as well as bipolar disorder.
Data were drawn from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions, a face-to-face interview of 34 653 non-institutionalized adults in the US general population. The meta-structure of 16 DSM-IV Axis I and Axis II psychiatric disorders, as assessed by the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule DSM-IV version (AUDADIS-IV), was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
We document an empirically derived thought disorder factor that is a subdomain of the internalizing dimension, characterized by schizoid, paranoid, schizotypal and avoidant personality disorders as well as manic episodes. Manic episodes exhibit notable associations with both the distress subdomain of the internalizing dimension as well as the thought disorder subdomain. The structure was replicated for bipolar disorder (I or II) in place of manic episodes.
As our understanding of psychopathological meta-structure expands, incorporation of disorders characterized by detachment and psychoticism grows increasingly important. Disorders characterized by detachment and psychoticism may be well conceptualized, organized and measured as a subdimension of the internalizing spectrum of disorders. Manic episodes and bipolar disorder exhibit substantial co-morbidity across both distress and thought disorder domains of the internalizing dimension. Clinically, these results underscore the potential utility of conceptualizing patient treatment needs using an approach targeting psychopathological systems underlying meta-structural classification rubrics.
共病的维度模型有可能改进精神障碍在研究和临床工作中的概念化,但对于相对罕见的障碍如何与更常见的障碍相适应,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在估计美国普通人群的精神病理学的元结构,重点关注具有思维障碍特征的五种研究较少的障碍的定位:偏执型、分裂型、回避型和分裂型人格障碍,以及躁狂发作和双相情感障碍。
数据来自美国普通人群的全国酒精相关状况流行病学调查,这是一项对 34653 名非机构化成年人的面对面访谈。使用探索性和验证性因素分析,检查了酒精使用障碍和相关障碍访谈表 DSM-IV 版本(AUDADIS-IV)评估的 16 种 DSM-IV 轴 I 和轴 II 精神障碍的元结构。
我们记录了一个经验主义得出的思维障碍因子,它是一个内化维度的子领域,其特征是分裂型、偏执型、分裂型和回避型人格障碍以及躁狂发作。躁狂发作与内化维度的痛苦子领域以及思维障碍子领域都有显著的关联。该结构在躁狂发作的基础上,对双相情感障碍(I 型或 II 型)进行了复制。
随着我们对精神病理学元结构的理解不断扩大,包含以分离和精神病为特征的障碍变得越来越重要。以分离和精神病为特征的障碍可以作为内化障碍谱的一个子维度进行很好的概念化、组织和测量。躁狂发作和双相情感障碍在内化维度的痛苦和思维障碍两个领域都表现出相当大的共病。从临床角度来看,这些结果强调了使用针对元结构分类准则下的病理心理系统的方法来确定患者治疗需求的潜在效用。