Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland.
J Biomech. 2013 Jan 4;46(1):197-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.11.005. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
This paper studied two different regression techniques for pelvic shape prediction, i.e., the partial least square regression (PLSR) and the principal component regression (PCR). Three different predictors such as surface landmarks, morphological parameters, or surface models of neighboring structures were used in a cross-validation study to predict the pelvic shape. Results obtained from applying these two different regression techniques were compared to the population mean model. In almost all the prediction experiments, both regression techniques unanimously generated better results than the population mean model, while the difference on prediction accuracy between these two regression methods is not statistically significant (α=0.01).
本文研究了两种不同的回归技术,即偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)和主成分回归(PCR),用于预测骨盆形状。在一项交叉验证研究中,使用了三种不同的预测因子,如表面标志、形态参数或相邻结构的表面模型,来预测骨盆形状。将这两种不同的回归技术得到的结果与人群平均模型进行了比较。在几乎所有的预测实验中,这两种回归技术都一致地产生了比人群平均模型更好的结果,而这两种回归方法在预测精度上的差异没有统计学意义(α=0.01)。