Department of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Schizophr Res. 2013 Jan;143(1):32-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.10.042. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
Several self-report instruments were developed to capture psychotic prodrome, and were claimed to have good predictive validity. The feasibility of screening is questionable considering the heterogeneity of the targeted populations and the negative ramifications of false positive identification. This study developed a questionnaire using data covering a wide range of clinical characteristics.
One hundred and eleven putative pre-psychotic participants, 129 normal comparison subjects, and 95 non-psychotic psychiatric outpatients completed a 231-item questionnaire comprising a 110-item Wisconsin psychotic prone scale, 74-item schizotypal personality questionnaire, 33-item basic symptoms, and 14-item cognitive symptoms. Items showing the best discriminating power, estimated using chi-square statistics with Bonferroni correction, were extracted to create a brief version. A two-stage cut-off approach emphasizing specific items was applied to maximize sensitivity and specificity. The concurrent validity of the proposed approach was estimated using a ten-fold cross-validation procedure.
A 15-item self-report questionnaire was developed. Respondents checking at least eight items, or those checking three to seven items including any of the three referring to feeling stress in crowds, aloofness, and perceptual disturbance, would be considered putatively pre-psychotic with the largest sensitivity+specificity (0.784+0.705=1.489). This cut-off selection was the best estimate by calculating 1000 permutations in the cross-validation procedure.
This investigation proposes a different orientation for applying questionnaires to screen putative pre-psychotic states, with less emphasis on attenuated psychotic symptoms and predictive values. Besides providing a handy tool for increasing awareness and referral, the instructions of such a screening questionnaire should be carefully worded.
已经开发出几种用于捕捉精神病前驱症状的自报式量表,并声称具有良好的预测效度。考虑到目标人群的异质性以及假阳性识别的负面后果,筛选的可行性值得怀疑。本研究使用涵盖广泛临床特征的数据开发了一种问卷。
111 名疑似前驱精神病患者、129 名正常对照者和 95 名非精神病性精神科门诊患者完成了一个由 231 个项目组成的问卷,包括 110 项威斯康星精神病倾向量表、74 项精神分裂型人格问卷、33 项基本症状和 14 项认知症状。使用卡方检验和 Bonferroni 校正估计具有最佳区分力的项目,提取出最佳的简洁版本。采用强调特定项目的两阶段截断方法,以最大限度地提高敏感性和特异性。通过十折交叉验证程序估计了所提出方法的同时效度。
开发了一个 15 项的自我报告问卷。如果答卷者勾选了至少八项,或勾选了三到七项,包括任何三项提示在人群中感到压力、冷漠和知觉障碍,那么他/她就被认为是疑似前驱精神病患者,具有最大的敏感性+特异性(0.784+0.705=1.489)。这种截断选择是通过在交叉验证过程中计算 1000 次随机抽样得到的最佳估计。
本研究提出了一种不同的方法来应用问卷来筛选疑似前驱精神病状态,较少关注减弱的精神病症状和预测值。除了提供一种方便的工具来提高意识和转诊率外,这种筛选问卷的说明应该措辞谨慎。