Bergjan Manuela, Hertel Frank
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Health Sciences Education and Nursing Science, Germany.
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Nov;33(11):1393-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
Clinical nursing education in Germany has not received attention in nursing science and practice for a long time, as it often seems to be a more or less "formalized appendix" of nursing education. Several development projects of clinical education taking place are mainly focused on the qualification of clinical preceptors. However, the clinical context and its influence on learning processes have still not been sufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was the testing of a German version of the clinical learning environment and supervision and nurse teacher scale (CLES + T scale). The sample of the pilot study consists of first-, second- and third-year student nurses (n=240) of a university nursing school from January to March 2011. Psychometric testing of the instrument is carried out by selected methods of classical testing theories using SPPS 19. The results show transferability of all subcategories of the CLES + T scale in the non-academic nursing education system of a university hospital in Germany, without the teacher scale. The strongest factor is "supervisory relationship". The German version of the CLES + T scale may help to evaluate and compare traditional and new models in clinical nursing education.
长期以来,德国的临床护理教育在护理科学与实践中未受到关注,因为它往往或多或少像是护理教育的“形式化附录”。正在开展的几个临床教育发展项目主要聚焦于临床带教老师的资质。然而,临床环境及其对学习过程的影响仍未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是对临床学习环境与监督及护士教师量表(CLES + T量表)的德文版进行测试。预试验的样本包括一所大学护理学院2011年1月至3月的一、二、三年级护理专业学生(n = 240)。使用SPPS 19通过经典测试理论的选定方法对该工具进行心理测量测试。结果表明,在德国一家大学医院的非学术护理教育体系中,CLES + T量表的所有子类别均可转换,但教师量表除外。最强的因素是“监督关系”。CLES + T量表的德文版可能有助于评估和比较临床护理教育中的传统模式和新模式。