• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

海洋保护区的专题成本效益分析。

A thematic cost-benefit analysis of a marine protected area.

机构信息

The Marine Institute, Marine Building, Level 3, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2013 Jan 15;114:476-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.048. Epub 2012 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.048
PMID:23206804
Abstract

The implementation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) is ultimately a social endeavour to sustain or improve human well-being via the conservation of marine ecosystems. The degree to which ecological gains are realised can depend upon how economic, ecological and social costs (negative impacts) and benefits (positive impacts) are included in the designation and management process. Without the support of key stakeholder groups whose user rights have been affected by the creation of an MPA, human impacts cannot be reduced. This study analyses a three year dataset to understand the themes associated with the economic, environmental and social costs and benefits of an MPA in Lyme Bay, United Kingdom (UK) following its establishment in 2008. Methodologically, the paper presents an ecosystem based management framework for analysing costs and benefits. Two hundred and forty one individuals were interviewed via questionnaire between 2008 and 2010 to determine perceptions and the level of support towards the MPA. Results reveal that despite the contentious manner in which this MPA was established, support for the MPA is strong amongst the majority of stakeholder groups. The level of support and the reasons given for support vary between stakeholder groups. Overall, the stakeholders perceive the social, economic and environmental benefits of the MPA to outweigh the perceived costs. There have been clear social costs of the MPA policy and these have been borne by mobile and static gear fishermen and charter boat operators. Local support for this MPA bodes well for the development of a network of MPAs around the UK coast under the United Kingdom Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009. However, this initial optimism is at risk if stakeholder expectation is not managed and the management vacuum is not filled.

摘要

海洋保护区(MPA)的实施最终是一项社会事业,旨在通过保护海洋生态系统来维持或提高人类福祉。生态效益的实现程度取决于经济、生态和社会成本(负面影响)和收益(正面影响)在指定和管理过程中得到了多少考虑。如果没有受到 MPA 创建影响的关键利益相关者群体的支持,人类的影响就无法减少。本研究分析了三年的数据,以了解英国莱姆湾(Lyme Bay)海洋保护区(MPA)自 2008 年建立以来,与 MPA 的经济、环境和社会成本与收益相关的主题。在方法上,本文提出了一个基于生态系统的管理框架,用于分析成本和收益。2008 年至 2010 年间,通过问卷调查采访了 241 个人,以确定他们对 MPA 的看法和支持程度。结果表明,尽管该 MPA 的建立方式存在争议,但大多数利益相关者群体对 MPA 的支持仍然很强。支持程度和支持的原因因利益相关者群体而异。总体而言,利益相关者认为 MPA 的社会、经济和环境效益超过了感知到的成本。MPA 政策已经产生了明显的社会成本,这些成本由移动和固定渔具渔民和包船经营者承担。当地对该 MPA 的支持为在 2009 年英国《海洋和沿海准入法》下在英国沿海建立一系列 MPA 网络奠定了良好的基础。然而,如果不能管理利益相关者的期望并填补管理真空,这种初步的乐观情绪将面临风险。

相似文献

1
A thematic cost-benefit analysis of a marine protected area.海洋保护区的专题成本效益分析。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Jan 15;114:476-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.048. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
2
An approach for integrating economic impact analysis into the evaluation of potential marine protected area sites.一种将经济影响分析纳入潜在海洋保护区选址评估的方法。
J Environ Manage. 2004 Apr;70(4):333-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.12.012.
3
Incorporation of spatial and economic analyses of human-use data in the design of marine protected areas.将人类使用数据的空间和经济分析纳入海洋保护区设计中。
Conserv Biol. 2011 Jun;25(3):485-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01626.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
4
Evaluating the success of a marine protected area: A systematic review approach.评估海洋保护区的成效:一种系统综述方法。
J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 1;183:280-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.029. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
5
Marine protected areas in the eastern African Region: how successful are they?东非地区的海洋保护区:它们有多成功?
Ambio. 2002 Dec;31(7-8):503-11.
6
Marine protected areas in Sri Lanka: a review.斯里兰卡的海洋保护区:综述
Environ Manage. 2007 Nov;40(5):727-38. doi: 10.1007/s00267-005-0154-x. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
7
Benefits and Challenges of Scaling Up Expansion of Marine Protected Area Networks in the Verde Island Passage, Central Philippines.菲律宾中部维尔迪岛海峡扩大海洋保护区网络的益处与挑战
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0135789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135789. eCollection 2015.
8
A property rights approach to understanding human displacement from protected areas: the case of marine protected areas.一种从产权角度理解保护区内人类流离失所问题的方法:以海洋保护区为例。
Conserv Biol. 2009 Feb;23(1):16-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01050.x. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
9
An effective regional Marine Protected Area network for the ROPME Sea Area: unrealistic vision or realistic possibility?建立一个有效的里海区域海洋保护区网络:不切实际的愿景还是现实的可能性?
Mar Pollut Bull. 2013 Jul 30;72(2):389-405. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.09.004. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
10
Drawing lines at the sand: evidence for functional vs. visual reef boundaries in temperate Marine Protected Areas.在沙滩上划线:温带海洋保护区中功能与视觉珊瑚礁边界的证据。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2013 Nov 15;76(1-2):194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
What are the outcomes of marine site protection on poverty of coastal communities in Southeast Asia? A systematic review protocol.东南亚沿海地区海洋保护区对沿海社区贫困状况有何影响?一项系统综述方案。
Environ Evid. 2022 Feb 4;11(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13750-022-00255-1.
2
Understanding How Marine Protected Areas Influence Local Prosperity-A Case Study of Gili Matra, Indonesia.理解海洋保护区如何影响当地繁荣——以印度尼西亚吉利马塔为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13508. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013508.
3
Social impacts of European Protected Areas and policy recommendations.
欧洲保护区的社会影响及政策建议。
Environ Sci Policy. 2020 Oct;112:134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.004.
4
Shifting seas, shifting boundaries: Dynamic marine protected area designs for a changing climate.沧海桑田,边界变迁:应对气候变化的动态海洋保护区设计。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0241771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241771. eCollection 2020.