• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨不明原因复发性妊娠丢失夫妇中性别差异与支持性护理偏好的关系。

Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Nov 30;21(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04277-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-021-04277-4
PMID:34847864
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8630871/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

International guidelines recommend to offer supportive care during a next pregnancy to couples affected by recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). In previous research, several options for supportive care have been identified and women's preferences have been quantified. Although it is known that RPL impacts the mental health of both partners, male preferences for supportive care have hardly been explored.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in couples who visited a specialized RPL clinic in the Netherlands between November 2018 and December 2019. Both members of the couples received a questionnaire that quantified their preferences for supportive care in a next pregnancy and they were asked to complete this independently from each other. Preferences for each supportive care option were analysed on a group level (by gender) and on a couple level, by comparing preferences of both partners.

RESULTS

Ninety-two questionnaires (completed by 46 couples) were analysed. The overall need for supportive care indicated on a scale from 1 to 10 was 6.8 for men and 7.9 for women (P = 0.002). Both genders preferred to regularly see the same doctor with knowledge of their obstetric history, to make a plan for the first trimester and to have frequent ultrasound examinations. A lower proportion of men preferred a doctor that shows understanding (80% of men vs. 100% of women, P = 0.004) and a doctor that informs on wellbeing (72% vs. 100%, P = ≤0.000). Fewer men preferred support from friends (48% vs. 74%, P = 0.017). Thirty-seven percent of men requested more involvement of the male partner at the outpatient clinic, compared to 70% of women (P = 0.007). In 28% of couples, partners had opposing preferences regarding peer support.

CONCLUSIONS

While both women and men affected by RPL are in need of supportive care, their preferences may differ. Current supportive care services may not entirely address the needs of men. Health care professionals should focus on both partners and development of novel supportive care programs with specific attention for men should be considered.

摘要

背景

国际指南建议为复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)夫妇提供下一胎的支持性护理。在之前的研究中,已经确定了几种支持性护理选择,并对女性的偏好进行了量化。尽管 RPL 会影响双方的心理健康,但男性对支持性护理的偏好几乎没有被探索过。

方法

2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 12 月,在荷兰一家专门的 RPL 诊所就诊的夫妇中进行了一项横断面研究。夫妇双方都收到了一份问卷,该问卷量化了他们在下一次妊娠中对支持性护理的偏好,并要求他们彼此独立完成。对支持性护理选项的偏好按群体(按性别)和夫妇两个层面进行分析,通过比较双方的偏好来进行。

结果

分析了 92 份问卷(由 46 对夫妇完成)。在 1 到 10 的量表上,男性的总体支持性护理需求为 6.8,女性为 7.9(P=0.002)。两性都更喜欢定期与了解他们产科病史的同一位医生就诊、制定孕早期计划和进行频繁的超声检查。较少的男性更喜欢理解他们的医生(80%的男性与 100%的女性相比,P=0.004)和告知他们健康状况的医生(72%与 100%相比,P≤0.000)。较少的男性喜欢朋友的支持(48%与 74%相比,P=0.017)。与女性相比,男性有 37%希望在门诊更多地参与男性伴侣,而女性有 70%(P=0.007)。在 28%的夫妇中,伴侣对同伴支持有相反的偏好。

结论

虽然受 RPL 影响的女性和男性都需要支持性护理,但他们的偏好可能不同。当前的支持性护理服务可能无法完全满足男性的需求。医疗保健专业人员应该关注双方,并考虑制定专门针对男性的新型支持性护理计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d82/8630871/fc00391e2ac0/12884_2021_4277_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d82/8630871/8d613e01323e/12884_2021_4277_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d82/8630871/fc00391e2ac0/12884_2021_4277_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d82/8630871/8d613e01323e/12884_2021_4277_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d82/8630871/fc00391e2ac0/12884_2021_4277_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care.探讨不明原因复发性妊娠丢失夫妇中性别差异与支持性护理偏好的关系。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Nov 30;21(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04277-4.
2
Supportive care for women with recurrent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences.复发性流产女性的支持性护理:一项量化女性偏好的调查。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Feb;28(2):398-405. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des374. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
3
Recurrent pregnancy loss: couples' perspectives on their need for treatment, support and follow up.复发性流产:夫妇对治疗、支持和随访需求的看法。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Feb 1;34(2):291-296. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey362.
4
Psychological adjustment and psychosocial stress among Japanese couples with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss.日本习惯性流产夫妇的心理调整和心理社会压力。
Hum Reprod. 2012 Mar;27(3):787-94. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der441. Epub 2012 Jan 2.
5
Stress and depression among women and men who have experienced recurrent pregnancy loss: focusing on both sexes.经历过反复妊娠丢失的女性和男性中的压力和抑郁:关注两性。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Jun;42(6):1172-1180. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
6
Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss : Their Psychology During Late Pregnancy and the Supportive Behavior of Their Partners.复发性流产的女性:她们在孕晚期的心理状况及其伴侣的支持行为。
Acta Med Okayama. 2018 Aug;72(4):387-394. doi: 10.18926/AMO/56176.
7
Factors that shape recurrent miscarriage care experiences: findings from a national survey.影响复发性流产护理体验的因素:一项全国性调查的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 31;23(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09347-1.
8
Supportive care for women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: patients' perspectives.支持性护理对不明原因复发性流产的女性:患者的观点。
Hum Reprod. 2011 Apr;26(4):873-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der021. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
9
'A sorrow shared …': a qualitative content analysis of what couples with recurrent miscarriages expect from one another and their families and friends.“分担的悲伤……”:对反复流产的夫妇对彼此以及家人和朋友的期望进行的质性内容分析
Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Jul 21;2022(3):hoac032. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac032. eCollection 2022.
10
Recurrent miscarriage clinics.复发性流产诊所
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014 Mar;41(1):145-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Views of knowledge users on recurrent miscarriage services and supports in the Republic of Ireland: a qualitative interview study.爱尔兰共和国知识使用者对复发性流产服务与支持的看法:一项定性访谈研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 10;15(4):e094753. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094753.
2
Applying Scientific Rationale to the Current Perceptions and Explanations of Massage and Miscarriage in the First Trimester.将科学原理应用于当前对孕早期按摩与流产的认知及解释
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2023 Mar 1;16(1):30-43. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v16i1.771. eCollection 2023 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors contributing to men's grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal death: further development of an emerging model in an Australian sample.导致男性在妊娠丢失和新生儿死亡后悲痛的因素:在澳大利亚样本中对一个新兴模型的进一步发展。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03514-6.
2
Recurrent pregnancy loss: a shared stressor---couple-orientated psychological research findings.复发性流产:一种共同的压力源——以夫妻为导向的心理学研究结果
Fertil Steril. 2020 Dec;114(6):1288-1296. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1421. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3
Men living through multiple miscarriages: protocol for a qualitative exploration of experiences and support requirements.
经历多次流产的男性:一项定性探索经历和支持需求的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 15;10(5):e035967. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035967.
4
Men's grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model.男性在妊娠丢失和新生儿丢失后的悲伤:系统评价和新兴理论模型。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 10;20(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2677-9.
5
ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss.欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会指南:复发性流产
Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Apr 6;2018(2):hoy004. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoy004. eCollection 2018.
6
Comparison and appraisal of (inter)national recurrent pregnancy loss guidelines.比较和评价(国际)复发性流产指南。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Sep;39(3):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
7
'There was just no-one there to acknowledge that it happened to me as well': A qualitative study of male partner's experience of miscarriage.“没有人承认这也发生在我身上”:一项关于男性伴侣流产经历的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 28;14(5):e0217395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217395. eCollection 2019.
8
Recurrent pregnancy loss: couples' perspectives on their need for treatment, support and follow up.复发性流产:夫妇对治疗、支持和随访需求的看法。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Feb 1;34(2):291-296. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey362.
9
Australian men's experiences of support following pregnancy loss: A qualitative study.澳大利亚男性在经历流产后的获得支持的体验:一项定性研究。
Midwifery. 2019 Mar;70:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
10
Psychosocial and biological paternal role in pregnancy outcomes.心理社会和生物学层面的父亲角色对妊娠结局的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jan;33(2):243-252. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1488167. Epub 2018 Jul 22.