• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

户外工作者的莱姆病:危险因素、预防措施及蜱虫清除方法。

Lyme disease in outdoor workers: risk factors, preventive measures, and tick removal methods.

作者信息

Schwartz B S, Goldstein M D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 1990 May;131(5):877-85. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115578.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115578
PMID:2321630
Abstract

A statewide cross-sectional study of risk factors for seropositivity for antibody to Borrelia burgdorferi in outdoor workers in New Jersey was performed in September and October 1988. The crude odds ratio associated with exposure to ticks on the primary state job was 2.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-9.0). After adjustment for multiple confounding variables with logistic regression, the adjusted occupational tick exposure odds ratio was 5.1 (95% CI 1.1-23.6). Additional analyses revealed that any use of insect repellent or antibiotics may have decreased the risk of Lyme disease in these workers (adjusted odds ratios for not using insect repellent or antibiotics were 2.0 (95% CI 1.0-4.0) and 2.3 (95% CI 0.8-6.7), respectively). These data suggest that Lyme disease is a hazard of outdoor work and that increased recognition of this fact will be necessary to prevent Lyme disease in these workers.

摘要

1988年9月和10月,在新泽西州对户外工作者进行了一项全州范围的横断面研究,以调查伯氏疏螺旋体抗体血清阳性的危险因素。在主要州立工作中,与接触蜱虫相关的粗比值比为2.2(95%置信区间(CI)0.7 - 9.0)。在通过逻辑回归对多个混杂变量进行调整后,调整后的职业性蜱虫接触比值比为5.1(95% CI 1.1 - 23.6)。进一步分析表明,使用驱虫剂或抗生素可能降低了这些工作者患莱姆病的风险(未使用驱虫剂或抗生素的调整后比值比分别为2.0(95% CI 1.0 - 4.0)和2.3(95% CI 0.8 - 6.7))。这些数据表明,莱姆病是户外工作的一种危害,并且有必要提高对这一事实的认识,以预防这些工作者感染莱姆病。

相似文献

1
Lyme disease in outdoor workers: risk factors, preventive measures, and tick removal methods.户外工作者的莱姆病:危险因素、预防措施及蜱虫清除方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 1990 May;131(5):877-85. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115578.
2
Antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi and tick salivary gland proteins in New Jersey outdoor workers.新泽西州户外工作者体内抗伯氏疏螺旋体和蜱唾液腺蛋白的抗体
Am J Public Health. 1993 Dec;83(12):1746-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.12.1746.
3
Longitudinal study of Borrelia burgdorferi infection in New Jersey outdoor workers, 1988-1991.1988 - 1991年新泽西州户外工作者伯氏疏螺旋体感染的纵向研究
Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Mar 1;139(5):504-12. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117033.
4
Lyme disease in New Jersey outdoor workers: a statewide survey of seroprevalence and tick exposure.新泽西州户外工作者的莱姆病:一项关于血清阳性率和蜱虫暴露情况的全州范围调查。
Am J Public Health. 1990 Oct;80(10):1225-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.10.1225.
5
Anti-tick antibodies: an epidemiologic tool in Lyme disease research.抗蜱抗体:莱姆病研究中的一种流行病学工具。
Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jul;132(1):58-66. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115643.
6
Anti-tick saliva antibody: a biologic marker of tick exposure that is a risk factor for Lyme disease seropositivity.抗蜱唾液抗体:一种蜱暴露的生物标志物,是莱姆病血清阳性的危险因素。
Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Jul 1;134(1):86-95. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115996.
7
Seroprevalence of Borrelia infection in occupational tick-exposed people in Bavaria (Germany).德国巴伐利亚州职业性蜱虫暴露人群中疏螺旋体感染的血清阳性率
Int J Med Microbiol. 2002 Jun;291 Suppl 33:215. doi: 10.1016/s1438-4221(02)80055-8.
8
Lyme borreliosis in Dutch forestry workers.荷兰林业工人中的莱姆病螺旋体病
J Infect. 1991 Nov;23(3):279-86. doi: 10.1016/0163-4453(91)92936-y.
9
[Risk factors associated with the presence of antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi].
Rev Clin Esp. 1999 Mar;199(3):136-41.
10
Lyme disease: a review for the occupational physician.莱姆病:职业医师综述
J Occup Med. 1989 Sep;31(9):735-42. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198909000-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
IxsS7: A novel biomarker for Ixodes scapularis tick bite exposure in humans.IxsS7:一种用于检测人类是否被肩突硬蜱叮咬的新型生物标志物。
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2025 Jul;16(4):102514. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2025.102514. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
2
Behavioral and cognitive factors influencing tick-borne disease risk in northeast China: Implications for prevention and control strategies.影响中国东北地区蜱传疾病风险的行为和认知因素:对预防和控制策略的启示
One Health. 2024 Apr 20;18:100736. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100736. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Perspective: Young Workers at Higher Risk for Carcinogen Exposures.
观点:年轻工人面临更高的致癌物暴露风险。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;10:869232. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.869232. eCollection 2022.
4
Personal protection measures to prevent tick bites in the United States: Knowledge gaps, challenges, and opportunities.美国预防蜱虫叮咬的个人防护措施:知识缺口、挑战和机遇。
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2022 Jul;13(4):101944. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101944. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
5
Inclusion of environmentally themed search terms improves Elastic net regression nowcasts of regional Lyme disease rates.包含环境主题的搜索词可以提高弹性网络回归对区域性莱姆病发病率的实时预测。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 10;17(3):e0251165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251165. eCollection 2022.
6
Tick magnets: The occupational risk of tick-borne disease exposure in forestry workers in New York.蜱虫磁铁:纽约林业工人接触蜱传疾病的职业风险
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 23;5(2):e509. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.509. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
The Effects of Lifestyle on the Risk of Lyme Disease in the United States: Evaluation of Market Segmentation Systems in Prevention and Control Strategies.生活方式对美国莱姆病风险的影响:预防和控制策略中的市场细分系统评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 7;18(24):12883. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412883.
8
Human Otoacariasis in Two Climatically Diverse Districts in Sri Lanka: Seasonality, Risk Factors, and Case Notes.斯里兰卡两个气候迥异地区的人类耳真菌病:季节性、危险因素和病例记录。
Acta Parasitol. 2021 Dec;66(4):1326-1340. doi: 10.1007/s11686-021-00372-w. Epub 2021 May 16.
9
Lyme disease: Current issues, implications, and recommendations for tourism management.莱姆病:当前问题、影响及对旅游管理的建议。
Tour Manag. 2015 Feb;46:408-418. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
10
Lymelight: forecasting Lyme disease risk using web search data.Lymelight:利用网络搜索数据预测莱姆病风险。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 4;3:16. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0222-x. eCollection 2020.