Özdemir Doğan Derya, Polat Nilufer Tulin, Polat Serkan, Şeker Emre, Gül Esma Başak
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Aug;16(4):501-10. doi: 10.1111/cid.12024. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the forces on the implant and supporting alveolar ridge in "all on four" concept and alternative designs using finite element analysis.
Different treatment alternatives with various implant designs were performed in an edentulous mandible. In Design 1, implants were placed according to "All-on-Four" concept; Design 2, two long (13 mm long, 4 mm diameter) and two short (7 mm long, 4 mm diameter) implants; Design 3, four long and two short implants; and Design 4, two long and four short implants were placed vertically. A force of 100 N for each tooth, a total of 300 N load was applied. Finite element analysis was used to evaluate and compare the different designs.
The stress concentration within the cortical bone was significantly higher than the trabecular bone around the neck of the implants. The maximum stress values were located around the cortical bone of the distal implant for all designs. The reduction in the number of implants did not diminish the success of the design.
In the presence of vertically resorbed posterior mandibula, although the "all on four" concept is a feasible approach clinically, short implants had decreased the amount of force transmitted to the supporting bone.
本研究旨在使用有限元分析评估“all on four”理念及替代设计中力对种植体和支持性牙槽嵴的影响。
在无牙下颌骨中进行不同种植体设计的不同治疗方案。设计1中,种植体按照“All-on-Four”理念植入;设计2中,植入两颗长(13毫米长,4毫米直径)和两颗短(7毫米长,4毫米直径)的种植体;设计3中,植入四颗长和两颗短的种植体;设计4中,垂直植入两颗长和四颗短的种植体。每颗牙齿施加100牛的力,共施加300牛的载荷。使用有限元分析来评估和比较不同设计。
皮质骨内的应力集中明显高于种植体颈部周围的小梁骨。所有设计的最大应力值均位于远端种植体的皮质骨周围。种植体数量的减少并未降低设计的成功率。
在垂直吸收的下颌后牙区,尽管“all on four”理念在临床上是一种可行的方法,但短种植体减少了传递到支持骨的力量。