• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于瞳孔直径的非球面人工晶状体效率的变化。

Change in efficiency of aspheric intraocular lenses based on pupil diameter.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;155(3):492-498.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.09.024. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2012.09.024
PMID:23218695
Abstract

PURPOSE

To measure the effect of spherical aberration correction by aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs) based on pupil diameter, and to determine the minimum pupil diameter for each aspheric IOL.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Eight-six patients (169 eyes) who were implanted with a HOYA AF-1 NY-60 (HOYA Corporation) or Tecnis ZCB00 1-piece IOL (Abbott Medical Optics Inc) were enrolled. Ocular, corneal, and internal spherical aberrations were measured at the 1-month postoperative visit using the Wavefront Analyzer KR-1W (Topcon). Minimum pupil diameter, which is required for each aspheric IOL to be effective, was calculated using a regression equation.

RESULTS

The mean value of internal spherical aberration of the Tecnis ZCB00 group (-0.09 ± 0.094 μm) was lower than that of the HOYA NY-60 group (-0.05 ± 0.072 μm) (P = .005). The original negative spherical aberrations of the HOYA NY-60 (-0.18 μm) were measured at a pupil diameter of 5.6 mm, and for the Tecnis ZCB00 (-0.27 μm) at a pupil diameter of 6.1 mm. The aspheric IOL efficiency dropped to 0% when the pupil diameter was 3.47 mm for the Tecnis ZCB00 group and 3.71 mm for the HOYA NY-60 group.

CONCLUSIONS

When the pupil diameters of patients are smaller than 3.4 mm for the Tecnis ZCB00 and 3.7 mm for the HOYA NY-60, the spherical aberration correction using these aspheric IOLs seems to be ineffective. Approximately 10% of the eyes showed smaller pupil size than the minimum effective diameter under mesopic conditions.

摘要

目的

基于瞳孔直径测量具有非球面性的人工晶状体(IOL)的像差矫正效果,并确定每种非球面 IOL 的最小瞳孔直径。

设计

回顾性横截面研究。

方法

纳入了 86 例(169 只眼)接受 HOYA AF-1 NY-60(HOYA 公司)或 Tecnis ZCB00 1 件式 IOL(Abbott Medical Optics Inc)植入的患者。术后 1 个月,使用 Wavefront Analyzer KR-1W(Topcon)测量眼、角膜和眼内球差。使用回归方程计算每种非球面 IOL 有效的最小瞳孔直径。

结果

Tecnis ZCB00 组的眼内球差平均值(-0.09±0.094μm)低于 HOYA NY-60 组(-0.05±0.072μm)(P=0.005)。HOYA NY-60 的原始负球差为-0.18μm,瞳孔直径为 5.6mm,而 Tecnis ZCB00 的原始负球差为-0.27μm,瞳孔直径为 6.1mm。当 Tecnis ZCB00 组的瞳孔直径为 3.47mm,HOYA NY-60 组的瞳孔直径为 3.71mm 时,非球面 IOL 的效率降至 0%。

结论

当 Tecnis ZCB00 的瞳孔直径小于 3.4mm,HOYA NY-60 的瞳孔直径小于 3.7mm 时,这些非球面 IOL 的像差矫正似乎无效。在中光条件下,约有 10%的眼睛的瞳孔尺寸小于有效最小直径。

相似文献

1
Change in efficiency of aspheric intraocular lenses based on pupil diameter.基于瞳孔直径的非球面人工晶状体效率的变化。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;155(3):492-498.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.09.024. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
2
Feasibility of spherical aberration correction with aspheric intraocular lenses in cataract surgery based on individual pupil diameter.基于个体瞳孔直径的白内障手术中使用非球面人工晶状体矫正球差的可行性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Oct;35(10):1725-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.031.
3
Effect of an aspheric intraocular lens on the ocular wave-front adjusted for pupil size and capsulorhexis size.非球面人工晶状体对根据瞳孔大小和撕囊大小调整后的眼波前的影响。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;92(5):e353-7. doi: 10.1111/aos.12344. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
4
Higher-order aberrations associated with better near visual acuity in eyes with aspheric monofocal IOLs.与非球面单焦点 IOL 眼更好的近视力相关的高阶像差。
J Refract Surg. 2014 Jul;30(7):442-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140530-01.
5
Intraindividual comparison of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses of same material and platform.相同材料和平台的非球面与球面人工晶状体的个体内比较。
Ophthalmology. 2009 May;116(5):896-901. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.11.022.
6
Ocular aberrations and visual performance with an aspheric single-piece intraocular lens: contralateral comparative study.非球面一体式人工晶状体的像差与视觉性能:对侧对比研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Sep;36(9):1536-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.03.046.
7
The influence of tilt, decentration, and pupil size on the higher-order aberration profile of aspheric intraocular lenses.倾斜、离轴和瞳孔大小对非球面人工晶状体高阶像差特征的影响。
Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep;118(9):1724-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.025. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
8
Spherical aberration and depth of focus in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a prospective randomized study.植入非球面和球面人工晶状体眼中的球差和焦深:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Ophthalmology. 2007 Nov;114(11):2050-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.024. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
9
[The influence of preoperative corneal spherical aberration on relatively personalized implantation of aspheric intraocular lens].[术前角膜球差对非球面人工晶状体相对个性化植入的影响]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2010 May;46(5):410-4.
10
Spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a comparative study.植入非球面和球面人工晶状体的眼睛的球差和对比敏感度:一项比较研究。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 May;145(5):827-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.023. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Pitfalls of Using NIR-Based Clinical Instruments to Test Eyes Implanted with Diffractive Intraocular Lenses.使用基于近红外光的临床仪器检测植入衍射型人工晶状体的眼睛的陷阱。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 27;13(7):1259. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071259.
2
Comparison of visual outcomes after two types of mix-and-match implanted trifocal extended-depth-of-focus and trifocal intraocular lenses.两种混合匹配植入式三焦点扩展景深和三焦点人工晶状体术后视觉效果的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;260(10):3275-3283. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05710-w. Epub 2022 May 28.
3
The efficiency of aspheric intraocular lens according to biometric measurements.
根据生物测量结果评估非球面人工晶状体的效率。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 16;12(10):e0182606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182606. eCollection 2017.
4
Comparison of two types of visual quality analyzer for the measurement of high order aberrations.两种用于测量高阶像差的视觉质量分析仪的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb 18;9(2):292-7. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.02.22. eCollection 2016.