Suppr超能文献

腰椎僵硬作为脊柱融合术的次要结果:一项初步临床研究。

Lumbar stiffness as a collateral outcome of spinal arthrodesis: a preliminary clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, OP 31, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2013 Feb;13(2):150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.014. Epub 2012 Dec 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Although spinal arthrodesis can improve function by correcting deformity and reducing pain, it also by intention reduces spinal mobility. Increased spinal stiffness may have the potential to impair function and ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), independent of pain levels.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ability to discriminate spinal stiffness from pain in ADLs after lumbar spine arthrodesis using two outcome instruments.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Consecutive cohort of lumbar spine fusion patients from a single surgeon's practice.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI), radiographs.

METHODS

We developed the LSDI questionnaire to assess the impact of spinal stiffness on ability to perform different ADLs. The LSDI and ODI were administered to 93 patients who underwent lumbar arthrodesis extending from one to five or more motion segments at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Comparisons of mean LSDI and ODI scores between patients were made using generalized linear regression. A Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was computed to determine the relationship between the LSDI and ODI scores.

RESULTS

The sample included 61 women and 32 men, with mean age at surgery of 55.0 years (standard deviation [SD], 13.1) and mean time since surgery of 3.4 years (SD, 1.8). The mean LSDI score was 29.6 (SD, 19.2), and the mean ODI score was 39.7 (SD, 19.1). Comparing one-level and five-level arthrodesis, the LSDI scores were significantly different (p=.05), whereas the ODI scores were not significantly different (p=.36). Comparisons between other levels of arthrodesis did not show significant differences for either the LSDI or the ODI. Within the entire study group, LSDI and ODI scores were positively correlated (r=0.69, p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Difficulty in performing certain ADLs increases for patients with multilevel lumbar fusions as opposed to one-level arthrodesis. The LSDI distinguishes functional difficulties with ADLs accruing because of spinal stiffness, which appear to be independent of the functional limitations resulting from low back pain as measured by ODI.

摘要

背景

虽然脊柱融合术可以通过矫正畸形和减轻疼痛来改善功能,但它也会有意降低脊柱的活动度。脊柱僵硬度的增加可能有损害功能和日常生活活动(ADL)能力的潜力,而与疼痛程度无关。

目的

使用两种结果工具评估腰椎融合术后 ADL 中脊柱僵硬度与疼痛之间的区分能力。

研究设计

横断面研究。

患者样本

来自一位外科医生的实践中的连续队列腰椎融合患者。

结果测量

Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI),腰椎僵硬度残疾指数(LSDI),X 线片。

方法

我们开发了 LSDI 问卷,以评估脊柱僵硬度对执行不同 ADL 的能力的影响。在至少 1 年的随访后,对 93 例接受腰椎融合术的患者进行了 LSDI 和 ODI 评估,融合术从一个到五个或更多运动节段延伸。使用广义线性回归比较患者之间的 LSDI 和 ODI 评分均值。计算 Pearson 相关系数(r)以确定 LSDI 和 ODI 评分之间的关系。

结果

样本包括 61 名女性和 32 名男性,手术时的平均年龄为 55.0 岁(标准差[SD],13.1),手术后的平均时间为 3.4 年(SD,1.8)。平均 LSDI 评分为 29.6(SD,19.2),平均 ODI 评分为 39.7(SD,19.1)。比较单节段和五节段融合术,LSDI 评分差异有统计学意义(p=.05),而 ODI 评分差异无统计学意义(p=.36)。其他节段融合术之间的比较在 LSDI 或 ODI 评分方面均无显著差异。在整个研究组中,LSDI 和 ODI 评分呈正相关(r=0.69,p<.001)。

结论

与单节段融合术相比,多节段腰椎融合术患者进行某些 ADL 的难度增加。LSDI 区分了由于脊柱僵硬而导致的 ADL 功能困难,这似乎与 ODI 测量的腰痛导致的功能限制无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验