Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Materials Science, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
J Dent. 2013 Jan;41(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.015. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
Many procedures used in prosthodontics, including the materials and methods used for complete denture impressions, lack support of good evidence. The aims were to systematically, and critically, review the literature on complete denture impression materials and methods to identify an impression procedure that can be considered expedient for achieving a satisfactory clinical outcome for complete denture wearers.
MEDLINE/PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on impression procedures used in the clinical fabrication of complete dentures. The search focused on best available evidence with respect to clinical outcome.
PubMed listed 1201 titles for the combination terms of complete denture and impression. Five relevant randomized controlled trials were identified. No review of complete denture impressions was found in the Cochrane Library.
Two-step procedures for complete denture impressions dominate all textbooks, teaching and specialist practice, despite an absence of convincing evidence of its superiority. No controlled studies supporting the use of border moulding, post-dam, and functional and mucostatic impressions, were identified. Two studies showed that a one-step method using alginate in a stock tray offers a similar clinical result to more complicated, expensive and time-consuming two-step material and technique combinations.
There was no support for the frequent textbook statement that the two-step procedure is necessary and superior to the one-step method. While some special clinical situations may benefit from other combinations of materials and techniques, the results suggest that the simple and inexpensive one-step procedure can serve the needs of the majority of edentulous patients.
In spite of the fact that two-step procedures for complete denture impressions dominate textbooks, teaching and specialist practice, the results of this review suggest that a simple and inexpensive one-step procedure can serve the needs of the majority of edentulous patients.
许多在修复学中使用的程序,包括全口义齿印模所使用的材料和方法,都缺乏良好证据的支持。本研究旨在系统地、批判性地综述全口义齿印模材料和方法的文献,以确定一种可被认为有利于实现全口义齿佩戴者满意临床效果的印模程序。
对用于临床制作全口义齿的印模程序的研究,在 MEDLINE/PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了检索。该搜索主要关注临床结果方面的最佳现有证据。
PubMed 列出了 1201 个关于全口义齿和印模的组合术语的标题。确定了 5 项相关的随机对照试验。在 Cochrane 图书馆中未发现关于全口义齿印模的综述。
两步法全口义齿印模程序主导了所有教科书、教学和专业实践,尽管没有令人信服的证据表明其优越性。没有发现支持边缘成型、后堤、功能和黏膜静止印模的对照研究。两项研究表明,使用商品化托盘中的藻酸盐的一步法提供了与更复杂、昂贵和耗时的两步法材料和技术组合相似的临床效果。
没有证据支持教科书中频繁出现的观点,即两步法程序是必要的,优于一步法。虽然某些特殊临床情况下可能受益于其他材料和技术的组合,但结果表明,简单且廉价的一步法程序可以满足大多数无牙患者的需求。
尽管两步法全口义齿印模程序主导了教科书、教学和专业实践,但本综述的结果表明,简单且廉价的一步法程序可以满足大多数无牙患者的需求。