• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[重症监护中知情同意书可读性分析]

[Analysis of informed consent readibility in intensive care].

作者信息

Ramírez-Puerta M R, Fernández-Fernández R, Frías-Pareja J C, Yuste-Ossorio M E, Narbona-Galdó S, Peñas-Maldonado L

机构信息

Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, España.

出版信息

Med Intensiva. 2013 Nov;37(8):503-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.medin.2012.08.013
PMID:23228699
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the readability of informed consent documents (IC) used in an intensive care department and in the Andalusian Healthcare System (AHS).

DESIGN

A descriptive study was carried out.

SCOPE

The Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary Hospital, and the AHS.

INTERVENTIONS

A review and analysis was made of the existing 14 IC models in the Intensive Care Unit and of another 14 IC models offered by the AHS, using the following readability scores: Flesch, Sentence complexity, LEGIN, Fernández-Huerta, Szigriszt and INFLESZ.

RESULTS

Twenty-four IC (85.7%) failed to satisfy some of the indexes, while three (10.7%) did not satisfy any of them. Four documents (14.3%) satisfied all the indexes analyzed, and therefore are easy to understand. Flesch score: satisfied by one of the ICU IC (7.1%) and by three of the AHS documents (21.4%). Sentence complexity score: satisfied by 11 of the ICU IC (78.6%) and by 13 of the AHS documents (92.8%). Fernández-Huerta score: satisfied by four of the ICU IC (28.6%) and by 13 of the AHS documents (92.8%). Szigriszt score: satisfied by two of the ICU IC (14.3%) and by 11 of the AHS documents (64.3%). INFLESZ score: satisfied by two of the ICU IC (14.3%) and by 10 of the AHS documents (71.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The documents analyzed are generally difficult to read and understand by most people, and do not satisfy the basic purpose for which they were drafted.

摘要

目的

分析重症监护病房及安达卢西亚医疗系统(AHS)中使用的知情同意书(IC)的可读性。

设计

开展一项描述性研究。

范围

一家三级医院的重症监护病房以及AHS。

干预措施

使用以下可读性评分标准,对重症监护病房现有的14种IC模板以及AHS提供的另外14种IC模板进行审查和分析:弗莱什、句子复杂度、莱金、费尔南德斯 - 韦尔塔、齐格里斯zt和INFLESZ。

结果

24份IC(85.7%)未满足部分指标,3份(10.7%)未满足任何指标。4份文件(14.3%)满足所有分析指标,因此易于理解。弗莱什评分:重症监护病房的1份IC(7.1%)以及AHS的3份文件(21.4%)满足该评分。句子复杂度评分:重症监护病房的11份IC(78.6%)以及AHS的13份文件(92.8%)满足该评分。费尔南德斯 - 韦尔塔评分:重症监护病房的4份IC(28.6%)以及AHS的13份文件(92.8%)满足该评分。齐格里斯zt评分:重症监护病房的2份IC(14.3%)以及AHS的11份文件(64.3%)满足该评分。INFLESZ评分:重症监护病房的2份IC(14.3%)以及AHS的10份文件(71.4%)满足该评分。

结论

所分析的文件总体上大多数人难以阅读和理解,未达到起草时的基本目的。

相似文献

1
[Analysis of informed consent readibility in intensive care].[重症监护中知情同意书可读性分析]
Med Intensiva. 2013 Nov;37(8):503-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
2
[Readability of surgical informed consent in Spain].[西班牙外科手术知情同意书的可读性]
Cir Esp. 2014 Mar;92(3):201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.02.027. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
3
[Informed consents readability in vascular surgery and its progress over time].[血管外科中知情同意书的可读性及其随时间的进展]
J Healthc Qual Res. 2020 Nov-Dec;35(6):355-363. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
4
Readability analysis of informed consent forms for genetic tests in Mexico.墨西哥遗传检测知情同意书的可读性分析。
Gac Med Mex. 2021;157(1):52-57. doi: 10.24875/GMM.20000087.
5
[Global analysis of the readability of the informed consent forms used in public hospitals of Spain].[西班牙公立医院使用的知情同意书可读性的全球分析]
Rev Calid Asist. 2017 Jul-Aug;32(4):200-208. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
6
[Can anybody understand the informed consent documents? A proposal to make it easier].[有人能理解知情同意书吗?一个使其更易懂的提议]
Rev Calid Asist. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):182-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
7
[Validation of the INFLESZ scale to evaluate readability of texts aimed at the patient].[用于评估面向患者文本可读性的INFLESZ量表的验证]
An Sist Sanit Navar. 2008 May-Aug;31(2):135-52. doi: 10.4321/s1137-66272008000300004.
8
[Readability of informed consent documents used in the hospitals of Asturias].[阿斯图里亚斯医院使用的知情同意书的可读性]
Gac Sanit. 2004 Mar-Apr;18(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(04)71822-1.
9
Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫苗试验知情同意书的长度与可读性评估
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e2110843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10843.
10
[Evaluation and improvement of the comprehension of informed consent documents].[知情同意书理解情况的评估与改进]
Cir Esp. 2016 Apr;94(4):221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2015.11.006. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of websites with patient information about spinal cord injury in Spanish.提供西班牙语脊髓损伤患者信息的网站质量
Spinal Cord. 2016 Jul;54(7):540-5. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.190. Epub 2015 Oct 20.