Bea-Muñoz M, Medina-Sánchez M, Flórez-García M T
Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Rehabilitation Service, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Surgery Department, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Spinal Cord. 2016 Jul;54(7):540-5. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.190. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
Descriptive, cross-sectional analysis of websites with information on spinal cord injury (SCI) in Spanish.
To assess the quality, readability and presence of quality labels on web pages with information about SCI in Spanish.
The Internet.
An Internet search was conducted on Google with the keywords 'lesión medular' (spinal cord injury), 'paraplejia' (paraplegia) and 'tetraplejia' (tetraplegia). The first 50 results of each search were included. The quality of websites was assessed with the LIDA tool while the readability was assessed with the Flesch-Szigriszt index and the INFLESZ scale. We also checked the presence of any quality label.
After excluding duplicated and irrelevant results, 33 websites were analysed. Only four of them had a quality label. The mean score of the LIDA tool was 61.12% (medium quality), and the worst results were those referring to the reliability of the information. The readability of the web pages was somewhat difficult, with a mean of 48.22 in the Flesch-Szigriszt index. Only eight of the websites showed normal readability. We observed no differences in either the quality or the readability of the websites according to their origin or the presence of quality labels.
The websites analysed present a medium quality. Mainly, they should improve the reliability of their contents and their readability, including more quality labels. For SCI information in Spanish to be understandable and to provide valuable content, websites analysed in our study need to improve the quality parameters.
对西班牙语脊髓损伤(SCI)相关信息网站进行描述性横断面分析。
评估提供西班牙语SCI信息的网页的质量、可读性及质量标签情况。
互联网。
在谷歌上使用关键词“lesión medular”(脊髓损伤)、“paraplejia”(截瘫)和“tetraplejia”(四肢瘫)进行互联网搜索。每个搜索的前50个结果被纳入。使用LIDA工具评估网站质量,同时用弗莱施-齐格里斯指数和INFLESZ量表评估可读性。我们还检查了是否存在任何质量标签。
排除重复和不相关结果后,分析了33个网站。其中只有4个有质量标签。LIDA工具的平均得分是61.12%(中等质量),最差的结果是关于信息可靠性方面。网页的可读性有些困难,弗莱施-齐格里斯指数平均为48.22。只有8个网站显示正常可读性。根据网站的来源或质量标签的有无,我们未观察到网站在质量或可读性方面存在差异。
所分析的网站质量中等。主要地,它们应提高内容的可靠性和可读性,包括增加更多质量标签。为使西班牙语的SCI信息易于理解并提供有价值的内容,我们研究中分析的网站需要改善质量参数。