Department of Health Evidence and Policy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1077, New York, NY 10029, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 May;28(5):630-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2274-3. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
Physicians are mandated to offer treatment choices to patients, yet not all patients may want the responsibility that entails. We evaluated predisposing factors for, and long-term consequences of, too much and not enough perceived decision-making responsibility among breast cancer patients.
Longitudinal assessment, with measurements collected just after surgical treatment (baseline) and 6-month follow-up.
Women with early-stage breast cancer treated surgically at eight NYC hospitals, recruited for a randomized controlled trial of patient assistance to improve receipt of adjuvant treatment.
Using logistic regression, we explored multivariable-adjusted associations between perceived treatment decision-making responsibility and a) baseline knowledge of treatment benefit and b) 6-month decision regret.
Of 368 women aged 28-89 years, 72 % reported a "reasonable amount", 21 % "too much", and 7 % "not enough" responsibility for treatment decision-making at baseline. Health literacy problems were most common among those with "not enough" (68 %) and "too much" responsibility (62 %). Only 29 % of women had knowledge of treatment benefits; 40 % experienced 6-month decision regret. In multivariable analysis, women reporting "too much" vs. "reasonable amount" of responsibility had less treatment knowledge ([OR] = 0.44, [95 % CI] = 0.20-0.99; model c = 0.7343;p < 0.01) and more decision regret ([OR] = 2.,91 [95 % CI] = 1.40-6.06; model c = 0.7937;p < 0.001). Findings were similar for women reporting "not enough" responsibility, though not statistically significant.
Too much perceived responsibility for breast cancer treatment decisions was associated with poor baseline treatment knowledge and 6-month decision regret. Health literacy problems were common, suggesting that health care professionals find alternative ways to communicate with low health literacy patients, enabling them to assume the desired amount of decision-making responsibility, thereby reducing decision regret.
医生有义务向患者提供治疗选择,但并非所有患者都希望承担相应的责任。我们评估了乳腺癌患者对治疗决策的感知责任过多和过少的倾向因素及其长期后果。
纵向评估,在手术治疗后(基线)和 6 个月随访时进行测量。
在纽约市的八家医院接受手术治疗的早期乳腺癌女性患者,参与了一项旨在通过患者协助来改善辅助治疗接受率的随机对照试验。
使用逻辑回归,我们探讨了感知治疗决策责任与 a)基线治疗获益知识和 b)6 个月决策后悔之间的多变量调整关联。
在 368 名年龄在 28-89 岁的女性中,72%的人报告在治疗决策方面“责任合理”,21%的人报告“责任过多”,7%的人报告“责任不足”。在“责任不足”和“责任过多”的患者中,健康素养问题最为常见(分别为 68%和 62%)。只有 29%的女性了解治疗益处;40%的女性经历了 6 个月的决策后悔。在多变量分析中,报告“责任过多”与“责任合理”的女性治疗知识较少(OR=0.44,95%CI=0.20-0.99;模型 c=0.7343;p<0.01),决策后悔更多(OR=2.91,95%CI=1.40-6.06;模型 c=0.7937;p<0.001)。对于报告“责任不足”的女性,结果相似,但无统计学意义。
对乳腺癌治疗决策的感知责任过多与较差的基线治疗知识和 6 个月决策后悔相关。健康素养问题很常见,这表明医疗保健专业人员需要寻找替代方式与低健康素养患者进行沟通,使他们能够承担预期的决策责任,从而减少决策后悔。