Suppr超能文献

[对波兰市场上几种防蚊叮咬驱虫剂效果的评估]

[Evaluation of effectiveness of several repellents against mosquito bites available at the Polish market].

作者信息

Mikulak Ewa, Gliniewicz Aleksandra, Królasik Agnieszka, Sawicka Bozena, Rabczenko Daniel

机构信息

Samodzielna Pracownia Entomologii Medycznej i Zwalczania Szkodników Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego, Państwowy Zakład Higieny w Warszawie.

出版信息

Przegl Epidemiol. 2012;66(3):479-85.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

BACKGROUND. Mosquitoes are blood-sucking insects, nuisance to humans and animals. Their bites cause itching and allergic reactions. These insects are also vectors of several viruses, bacteria and parasites. Protection against mosquitoes is therefore justified and desirable. This can give repellents and products for protection small outdoor areas such as terraces, home gardens. OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of eight selected products with different formulations used against mosquitoes including: 5 preparations for use on the body or clothing (repellents A, B, C, D, E and 3 products for use in small outdoor spaces (I, J, K).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

[corrected] Repellents were tested in laboratory trials, when volunteers were exposed to Aedes aegypti females breeding in the laboratory. Products I, J, K were tested in field trials; volunteers were exposed to female mosquitoes at various ages from the environment (Aedes sp, Culex sp).

RESULTS

The results showed that all tested repellents were efficient during 4 hrs. After this time their effectiveness decreased--fast in the case of repellent B (10% DEET), not very fast, but significant--in the case of repellent C (15% DEET). Three products for small area protection gave (each of them) 3-hour protection against mosquito bites. Product K (21,97% allethrin) was 100% effective (no bites at all).

CONCLUSIONS

Both kinds of product can give effective protection against mosquito bites. Their use is most effective, cheaper and more safe for the environment method of protection against mosquitoes than chemical spraying of large areas.

摘要

未标注

背景。蚊子是吸血昆虫,对人类和动物造成困扰。它们的叮咬会引起瘙痒和过敏反应。这些昆虫也是多种病毒、细菌和寄生虫的传播媒介。因此,预防蚊子叮咬是合理且必要的。这可以通过使用驱蚊剂和用于保护诸如露台、家庭花园等小型户外区域的产品来实现。目的。本研究的目的是评估八种不同配方的选定产品对蚊子的防治效果,其中包括:5种用于身体或衣物的制剂(驱蚊剂A、B、C、D、E)和3种用于小型户外空间的产品(I、J、K)。

材料与方法

[已修正]驱蚊剂在实验室试验中进行测试,志愿者暴露于在实验室中繁殖的埃及伊蚊雌蚊。产品I、J、K在现场试验中进行测试;志愿者暴露于来自环境中的不同年龄段的雌蚊(伊蚊属、库蚊属)。

结果

结果表明,所有测试的驱蚊剂在4小时内均有效。在此之后,它们的效果下降——驱蚊剂B(10%避蚊胺)下降很快,驱蚊剂C(15%避蚊胺)下降不太迅速,但很显著。三种用于小面积防护的产品(每种)都能提供3小时的防蚊叮咬保护。产品K(21.97%丙烯菊酯)的防护效果达100%(完全没有叮咬)。

结论

这两类产品都能有效预防蚊子叮咬。与大面积化学喷洒相比,使用它们预防蚊子叮咬是最有效、更便宜且对环境更安全的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验