Department of Psychology and Neuroscience and Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, 450 Research Drive, Levine Science Research Center, Room B203, Box 90999, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr;20(2):228-42. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0359-y.
Working memory (WM) and attention have been studied as separate cognitive constructs, although it has long been acknowledged that attention plays an important role in controlling the activation, maintenance, and manipulation of representations in WM. WM has, conversely, been thought of as a means of maintaining representations to voluntarily guide perceptual selective attention. It has more recently been observed, however, that the contents of WM can capture visual attention, even when such internally maintained representations are irrelevant, and often disruptive, to the immediate external task. Thus, the precise relationship between WM and attention remains unclear, but it appears that they may bidirectionally impact one another, whether or not internal representations are consistent with the external perceptual goals. This reciprocal relationship seems, further, to be constrained by limited cognitive resources to handle demands in either maintenance or selection. We propose here that the close relationship between WM and attention may be best described as a give-and-take interdependence between attention directed toward either actively maintained internal representations (traditionally considered WM) or external perceptual stimuli (traditionally considered selective attention), underpinned by their shared reliance on a common cognitive resource. Put simply, we argue that WM and attention should no longer be considered as separate systems or concepts, but as competing and influencing one another because they rely on the same limited resource. This framework can offer an explanation for the capture of visual attention by irrelevant WM contents, as well as a straightforward account of the underspecified relationship between WM and attention.
工作记忆 (WM) 和注意力一直被视为独立的认知结构进行研究,尽管长期以来人们一直承认注意力在控制 WM 中表示的激活、维持和操作方面起着重要作用。相反,WM 被认为是一种维持表示以自愿引导感知选择性注意的方式。然而,最近人们观察到,即使 WM 中的内容与当前的外部任务不相关且通常具有干扰性,它们也可以捕获视觉注意力。因此,WM 和注意力之间的确切关系仍不清楚,但它们似乎可能相互影响,无论内部表示是否与外部感知目标一致。这种相互关系似乎进一步受到处理维持或选择需求的有限认知资源的限制。我们在这里提出,WM 和注意力之间的密切关系最好被描述为对积极维持的内部表示(传统上被认为是 WM)或外部感知刺激(传统上被认为是选择性注意力)的注意力之间的一种相互依存关系,这是由它们对共同认知资源的共同依赖所支撑的。简单来说,我们认为 WM 和注意力不应该再被视为独立的系统或概念,而是相互竞争和影响,因为它们依赖于相同的有限资源。这个框架可以解释无关 WM 内容如何捕获视觉注意力,以及 WM 和注意力之间关系不明确的原因。