Catanzariti Domenico, Maines Massimiliano, Angheben Carlo, Centonze Maurizio, Cemin Claudio, Vergara Giuseppe
Division of Cardiology, S Maria del Carmine Hospital, Rovereto (TN), Italy.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2012 Nov;12(6):237-49. doi: 10.1016/s0972-6292(16)30563-0. Epub 2012 Dec 2.
Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) has been proven to be very effective for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) if complete occlusion is achieved and conventionally assessed by angiographic injection of contrast within PV lumen. The aim of our study was to assess the usefulness of saline contrast intracardiac echocardiography in guiding CBA with respect to PV angiography.
Thirty consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned fluoroscopy plus color-flow Doppler (n = 15; group 1: an iodinated medium as both angiographic and echographic contrast) or contrast intracardiac echocardiography plus color-flow Doppler (n = 15; group 2: saline contrast) for guidance of CBA.
We evaluated 338 occlusions of 107 PVs. The intracardiac echocontrastography-guided assessment of occlusion, defined as loss of echocontrastographic back-flow to the left atrium after saline injection regardless of the visualization of PV antrum, showed a high level of agreement with the angiographic diagnosis of occlusion. PVI rate was similar in both groups and effectively guided by intracardiac echocontrastography (PVI using ≤ 2 double cryofreezes: 89% of PVs in group 1 vs. 91% in group 2; p=n.s.). Group 2 patients had significantly shorter procedure (127 ± 16 vs. 152 ± 19 minutes; p<0.05) and fluoroscopy times (30 ± 12 vs. 43 ± 9 minutes, p<0.05) and used a lower iodinated contrast (88 ± 26 vs. 190 ± 47 mL, p<0.05).
PV occlusion and PVI during cryoablation can be effectively predicted by intracardiac saline echocontrastography. This technique reduces procedural time, radiological exposure and iodinated contrast use.
如果实现了完全闭塞,并通过在肺静脉腔内血管造影注射造影剂进行常规评估,冷冻球囊消融术(CBA)已被证明对肺静脉隔离(PVI)非常有效。我们研究的目的是评估生理盐水对比剂心腔内超声心动图在指导CBA方面相对于肺静脉血管造影的有用性。
连续30例阵发性心房颤动患者被随机分配接受荧光透视加彩色血流多普勒检查(n = 15;第1组:使用碘化介质作为血管造影和超声心动图造影剂)或对比剂心腔内超声心动图加彩色血流多普勒检查(n = 15;第2组:生理盐水对比剂)以指导CBA。
我们评估了107条肺静脉的338次闭塞情况。心腔内超声造影引导下对闭塞的评估定义为注射生理盐水后左心房回声造影剂反流消失,无论肺静脉前庭是否可见,与血管造影诊断的闭塞情况高度一致。两组的PVI率相似,并且心腔内超声造影有效地指导了PVI(使用≤2次双冷冻进行PVI:第1组中89%的肺静脉,第2组中91%的肺静脉;p = 无显著差异)。第2组患者的手术时间明显更短(127±16分钟对152±19分钟;p<0.05),荧光透视时间更短(30±12分钟对43±9分钟,p<0.05),并且使用的碘化造影剂更少(88±26毫升对190±47毫升,p<0.05)。
心腔内生理盐水超声造影可以有效预测冷冻消融过程中的肺静脉闭塞和PVI。该技术减少了手术时间、放射暴露和碘化造影剂的使用。