• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌患者转诊来源与结局的关系。

The association between referral source and outcome in patients with colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Colorectal Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, King Edward VII Building, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK.

出版信息

Surgeon. 2013 Jun;11(3):141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.surge.2012.10.004
PMID:23238513
Abstract

AIM

The colorectal two-week wait fast track (FT) referral system was nationally implemented in the UK in 2000 to ensure patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) received prompt access to specialized services. The aim of this study was to determine the association between the mechanism of referral to colorectal services and the 5-year outcomes for patients with CRC.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed CRC presenting between October 2002 and September 2004 were identified retrospectively. Analysis for survival and recurrence of disease at 5 years from presentation was undertaken. Outcomes for patients were compared between fast track (FT), non-fast track (NFT) and emergency referral (ER) routes, using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.

RESULTS

Out of 189 patients, 96 (51%) presented via the FT, 41 (22.5%) via the NFT and 52 (27.5%) via the ER referral route. The 5-year overall survival was 52.6% ± 5.1, 41.5% ± 7.7 and 38.5% ± 6.7 for the FT-, NFT- and ER groups respectively (p = 0.075). The 5-year cancer specific survival was 60.3% ± 5.2, 58.8% ± 5.3 and 43.5% ± 7.2 for the FT-, NFT- and ER groups respectively (p = 0.056). Patients referred as emergencies had worse 5-year overall survival; 49.3% ± 4.3 (FT&NFT) vs. 38.5% ± 6.7 (ER) (p = 0.042) and 5-year cancer specific survival 59.8% ± 4.4 (FT&NFT) vs. 43.5% ± 7.2 (ER) (p = 0.016). A total of 136 patients (FT n = 71, NFT n = 34, ER n = 31) underwent potentially curative surgery. Differences in 5-year survival did not reach statistical significance in these patients.

CONCLUSION

Referral route to specialist services for patients with CRC via the fast track pathway compared to non-fast track pathway was not associated with improved survival.

摘要

目的

英国于 2000 年在全国范围内实施了结直肠癌两周快速通道(FT)转诊系统,以确保结直肠癌患者能够及时获得专业服务。本研究旨在确定向结直肠服务机构转诊的机制与结直肠癌患者 5 年预后之间的关系。

方法

回顾性分析 2002 年 10 月至 2004 年 9 月期间新诊断为结直肠癌的连续患者。从就诊时起,对 5 年的生存和疾病复发情况进行分析。采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存估计,比较快速通道(FT)、非快速通道(NFT)和紧急转诊(ER)途径患者的预后。

结果

在 189 名患者中,96 名(51%)通过 FT 途径就诊,41 名(22.5%)通过 NFT 途径就诊,52 名(27.5%)通过 ER 途径就诊。FT-、NFT-和 ER 组的 5 年总生存率分别为 52.6%±5.1%、41.5%±7.7%和 38.5%±6.7%(p=0.075)。FT-、NFT-和 ER 组的 5 年癌症特异性生存率分别为 60.3%±5.2%、58.8%±5.3%和 43.5%±7.2%(p=0.056)。急诊就诊的患者 5 年总生存率较差;49.3%±4.3%(FT&NFT)vs.38.5%±6.7%(ER)(p=0.042)和 5 年癌症特异性生存率 59.8%±4.4%(FT&NFT)vs.43.5%±7.2%(ER)(p=0.016)。共有 136 名患者(FT n=71,NFT n=34,ER n=31)接受了潜在可治愈的手术。在这些患者中,5 年生存率的差异没有达到统计学意义。

结论

与非快速通道途径相比,通过快速通道途径将结直肠癌患者转诊至专科服务机构与生存改善无关。

相似文献

1
The association between referral source and outcome in patients with colorectal cancer.结直肠癌患者转诊来源与结局的关系。
Surgeon. 2013 Jun;11(3):141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
2
The association between referral source and stage of disease in patients with colorectal cancer.结直肠癌患者转诊来源与疾病分期之间的关联。
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jan;10(1):58-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01222.x. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
3
Has the 'Fast-Track' referral system affected the route of presentation and/or clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer?“快速通道”转诊系统是否影响了结直肠癌患者的就诊途径和/或临床结局?
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun 8;14(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0911-8.
4
The 2-week wait referral system does not improve 5-year colorectal cancer survival.2 周等待转诊系统并不能提高 5 年结直肠癌生存率。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;14(4):e177-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02826.x.
5
How has the 'two-week wait' rule affected the presentation of colorectal cancer?“两周等待”规则对结直肠癌的就诊情况有何影响?
Colorectal Dis. 2005 Sep;7(5):450-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00821.x.
6
Impact of the United Kingdom national bowel cancer awareness campaigns 2012 on colorectal cancer services and patient survival.2012年英国全国肠癌宣传活动对结直肠癌服务及患者生存率的影响
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Dec;17(12):1055-61. doi: 10.1111/codi.13038.
7
The "two-week wait" referral pathway is not associated with improved survival for patients with colorectal cancer.“两周等待”转诊途径与结直肠癌患者的生存改善无关。
Int J Surg. 2017 Jul;43:181-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.046. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
8
A paradox explained? Patients with delayed diagnosis of symptomatic colorectal cancer have good prognosis.一个悖论得到解释了吗?有症状的结直肠癌诊断延迟的患者预后良好。
Colorectal Dis. 2006 Jun;8(5):423-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00958.x.
9
The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung cancer detection in general practice. A clinical, cluster-randomised trial.在全科医疗中,直接转诊进行快速CT扫描对早期肺癌检测的效果。一项临床、整群随机试验。
Dan Med J. 2015 Mar;62(3).
10
The "two-week wait" referral pathway allows prompt treatment but does not improve outcome for patients with oesophago-gastric cancer.“两周等待”转诊途径可实现快速治疗,但对食管癌和胃癌患者的治疗效果并无改善。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Oct;36(10):977-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of time to resection with survival in patients with colon cancer.结肠癌患者手术切除时间与生存的关系。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):614-623. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10548-2. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
Outcome of Operated Colorectal Cancers in Relation to the Type of Initial Referral.接受手术的结直肠癌患者的预后与初始转诊类型的关系
Cureus. 2023 Mar 29;15(3):e36840. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36840. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Determinants of emergency presentation in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
结直肠癌患者急诊就诊的决定因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 14;12(1):4366. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08447-y.
4
Evaluation of treatment delays in hepatopancreatico-biliary surgery during the first COVID-19 wave.评估 COVID-19 第一波期间肝胆胰手术的治疗延迟。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Aug;105(S2):S12-S17. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0317. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
5
Prognostic consequences of implementing cancer patient pathways in Denmark: a comparative cohort study of symptomatic cancer patients in primary care.丹麦实施癌症患者路径的预后后果:初级保健中症状性癌症患者的对比队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Sep 6;17(1):627. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3623-8.
6
Has the 'Fast-Track' referral system affected the route of presentation and/or clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer?“快速通道”转诊系统是否影响了结直肠癌患者的就诊途径和/或临床结局?
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun 8;14(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0911-8.