Suppr超能文献

马尼地平与氨氯地平对高血压患者肾内血液动力学的影响。

Effects of manidipine vs. amlodipine on intrarenal haemodynamics in patients with arterial hypertension.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jan;75(1):129-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04336.x.

Abstract

AIMS

Intraglomerular pressure is one of the main drivers of progression of renal failure. Experimental data suggest that there are important differences between calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in their renal haemodynamic effects: manidipine reduces, whereas amlodipine increases intraglomerular pressure. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of manidipine and amlodipine treatment on intragomerular pressure (P(glom)) in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, parallel group study, hypertensive patients were randomly assigned to receive manidipine 20 mg (n = 54) or amlodipine 10 mg (n = 50) for 4 weeks. Renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were determined by constant-infusion input-clearance technique with p-aminohippurate (PAH) and inulin. P(glom) and resistances of the afferent (R(A)) and efferent (R(E)) arterioles were calculated according to the model established by Gomez.

RESULTS

P(glom) did not change in the manidipine group (P = 0.951), whereas a significant increase occurred in the amlodipine group (P = 0.009). There was a significant difference in the change of P(glom) by 1.2 mmHg between the manidipine and amlodipine group (P = 0.042). In both treatment arms, R(A) was reduced (manidipine P = 0.018; amlodipine P < 0.001). The reduction of R(A) was significantly more pronounced with amlodipine compared with manidipine treatment (P < 0.001). R(E) increased in both treatment arms (manidipine P = 0.012; amlodipine P = 0.002), with no difference between the treatment arms. Both CCBs significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) (both P < 0.001). However, amlodipine treatment resulted in a significantly greater decrease of BP compared with manidipine (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In accordance with experimental data after antihypertensive treatment of 4 weeks, intraglomerular pressure was significantly lower with the CCB manidipine than with amlodipine, resulting and explaining their disparate effects on albuminuria.

摘要

目的

肾小球内压是肾功能衰竭进展的主要驱动因素之一。实验数据表明,钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)在其肾脏血流动力学效应方面存在重要差异:马尼地平降低肾小球内压,而氨氯地平增加肾小球内压。本研究旨在探讨马尼地平和氨氯地平治疗对轻度至中度原发性高血压患者肾小球内压(P(glom))的影响。

方法

在这项随机、双盲、平行组研究中,高血压患者被随机分配接受马尼地平 20mg(n=54)或氨氯地平 10mg(n=50)治疗 4 周。通过用对氨基马尿酸(PAH)和菊粉进行恒速输注清除技术来确定肾血浆流量(RPF)和肾小球滤过率(GFR)。根据 Gomez 建立的模型计算肾小球内压(P(glom))和入球小动脉(R(A))和出球小动脉(R(E))的阻力。

结果

马尼地平组肾小球内压无变化(P=0.951),而氨氯地平组显著升高(P=0.009)。马尼地平组和氨氯地平组之间肾小球内压变化相差 1.2mmHg,差异有统计学意义(P=0.042)。在两个治疗组中,R(A)均降低(马尼地平 P=0.018;氨氯地平 P<0.001)。与马尼地平治疗相比,氨氯地平治疗时 R(A)的降低更为明显(P<0.001)。在两个治疗组中,R(E)均增加(马尼地平 P=0.012;氨氯地平 P=0.002),但两组之间无差异。两种 CCB 均显著降低收缩压和舒张压(BP)(均 P<0.001)。然而,与马尼地平相比,氨氯地平治疗导致 BP 显著下降(P<0.001)。

结论

与 4 周降压治疗后的实验数据一致,CCB 马尼地平治疗后肾小球内压明显低于氨氯地平,这解释了它们对白蛋白尿的不同作用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Oxidative Stress in Kidney Injury and Hypertension.肾脏损伤与高血压中的氧化应激
Antioxidants (Basel). 2024 Nov 27;13(12):1454. doi: 10.3390/antiox13121454.
7
Treatment of Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease.慢性肾脏病的高血压治疗。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018 Jun 11;20(8):64. doi: 10.1007/s11906-018-0864-0.
9
Influence of sex on hyperfiltration in patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes.性别对单纯 1 型糖尿病患者超滤的影响。
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2017 Apr 1;312(4):F599-F606. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00357.2016. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
10
The Gomez' equations and renal hemodynamic function in kidney disease research.戈麦斯方程与肾脏疾病研究中的肾脏血流动力学功能。
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016 Nov;311(5):F967-F975. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00415.2016. Epub 2016 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

5
Screening for albuminuria identifies individuals at increased renal risk.蛋白尿筛查可识别出肾脏风险增加的个体。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Apr;20(4):852-62. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008060655. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
10
Ca2+ channel subtypes and pharmacology in the kidney.肾脏中的钙离子通道亚型与药理学
Circ Res. 2007 Feb 16;100(3):342-53. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000256155.31133.49.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验