Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Physiol Meas. 2013 Jan;34(1):17-33. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/34/1/17. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
Complexity analysis of short-term cardiovascular control is traditionally performed using entropy-based approaches including corrective terms or strategies to cope with the loss of reliability of conditional distributions with pattern length. This study proposes a new approach aiming at the estimation of conditional entropy (CE) from short data segments (about 250 samples) based on the k-nearest-neighbor technique. The main advantages are: (i) the control of the loss of reliability of the conditional distributions with the pattern length without introducing a priori information; (ii) the assessment of complexity indexes without fixing the pattern length to an arbitrary low value. The approach, referred to as k-nearest-neighbor conditional entropy (KNNCE), was contrasted with corrected approximate entropy (CApEn), sample entropy (SampEn) and corrected CE (CCE), being the most frequently exploited approaches for entropy-based complexity analysis of short cardiovascular series. Complexity indexes were evaluated during the selective pharmacological blockade of the vagal and/or sympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system. We found that KNNCE was more powerful than CCE in detecting the decrease of complexity of heart period variability imposed by double autonomic blockade. In addition, KNNCE provides indexes indistinguishable from those derived from CApEn and SampEn. Since this result was obtained without using strategies to correct the CE estimate and without fixing the embedding dimension to an arbitrary low value, KNNCE is potentially more valuable than CCE, CApEn and SampEn when the number of past samples most useful to reduce the uncertainty of future behaviors is high and/or variable among conditions and/or groups.
传统上,使用基于熵的方法来分析短期心血管控制的复杂性,其中包括校正项或策略,以应对条件分布的可靠性随着模式长度的损失。本研究提出了一种新的方法,旨在基于最近邻技术从短数据段(约 250 个样本)估计条件熵(CE)。主要优点是:(i)控制条件分布的可靠性随着模式长度的损失,而无需引入先验信息;(ii)评估复杂度指标,而无需将模式长度固定为任意低值。该方法称为最近邻条件熵(KNNCE),与校正近似熵(CApEn)、样本熵(SampEn)和校正 CE(CCE)进行了对比,这些方法是用于短心血管序列的基于熵的复杂性分析的最常用方法。复杂度指标在选择性药理学阻断自主神经的迷走神经和/或交感神经分支时进行评估。我们发现,KNNCE 在检测双重自主神经阻断对心率变异性复杂性降低的检测能力方面优于 CCE。此外,KNNCE 提供的指标与 CApEn 和 SampEn 衍生的指标无法区分。由于这个结果是在不使用校正 CE 估计策略和不将嵌入维度固定为任意低值的情况下获得的,因此,当最有用的过去样本数量较高且/或在条件和/或组之间变化时,KNNCE 比 CCE、CApEn 和 SampEn 更有价值。