Kuijper E J, van Alphen L, Peeters M F, Brenner D J
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Mar;28(3):584-90. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.3.584-590.1990.
A bacterial agglutination assay, a toxin-neutralizing assay, and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were used to compare antibodies against intestinal Aeromonas strains in serum samples from healthy carriers (n = 6), from patients with acute (n = 15) or chronic (n = 8) gastroenteritis, from patients with gastroenteritis caused by other enteropathogenic bacteria (n = 3), and from healthy blood donors (n = 50). Evaluation of the bacterial agglutination assay showed that it was not very useful. The sensitivity of the ELISA in patients with acute or chronic aeromonas-associated diarrhea was 30% (7 of 23 patients were positive), whereas the specificity was 74% (13 of 50 healthy donors were positive). Positive results in the ELISA correlated with immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G responses to lipopolysaccharides of homologous Aeromonas strains, as determined by gel immunoradioassay and Western immunoblot analysis. The sera showed cross-reactions with heterologous Aeromonas strains and with Escherichia coli strains. The toxin-neutralizing assay was positive in 5 of 11 patients who had developed acute severe diarrhea associated with cytotoxin-producing Aeromonas strains (46% sensitivity), whereas only 3 of 50 healthy donors had low serum titers of cytotoxin-neutralizing antibodies (94% specificity). All five patients were over 60 years of age. Cytotoxin-neutralizing activity was not observed in the sera of other groups of patients with aeromonads in their feces. We concluded that the three different serologic assays were not consonant with one another and that only the toxin-neutralizing assay distinguished patients with acute diarrhea from other groups of patients.
采用细菌凝集试验、毒素中和试验和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),比较健康携带者(n = 6)、急性(n = 15)或慢性(n = 8)肠胃炎患者、其他肠道病原菌引起的肠胃炎患者(n = 3)以及健康献血者(n = 50)血清样本中针对肠道气单胞菌菌株的抗体。对细菌凝集试验的评估表明其用处不大。ELISA在急性或慢性气单胞菌相关性腹泻患者中的敏感性为30%(23例患者中有7例阳性),而特异性为74%(50例健康献血者中有13例阳性)。ELISA阳性结果与通过凝胶免疫放射测定法和蛋白质免疫印迹分析所确定的针对同源气单胞菌菌株脂多糖的免疫球蛋白M和免疫球蛋白G反应相关。血清与异源气单胞菌菌株和大肠杆菌菌株存在交叉反应。毒素中和试验在11例因产细胞毒素气单胞菌菌株而发生急性严重腹泻的患者中有5例呈阳性(敏感性为46%),而50例健康献血者中只有3例具有低血清滴度的细胞毒素中和抗体(特异性为94%)。所有5例患者均年龄超过60岁。在粪便中有气单胞菌的其他患者组血清中未观察到细胞毒素中和活性。我们得出结论,这三种不同的血清学检测方法结果不一致,只有毒素中和试验能将急性腹泻患者与其他患者组区分开来。