Murphy Gregory L, Hampton James A, Milovanovic Goran S
New York University.
J Mem Lang. 2012 Nov 1;67(4):521-539. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.005.
Four experiments investigated the classic issue in semantic memory of whether people organize categorical information in hierarchies and use inference to retrieve information from them, as proposed by Collins & Quillian (1969). Past evidence has focused on RT to confirm sentences such as "All birds are animals" or "Canaries breathe." However, confounding variables such as familiarity and associations between the terms have led to contradictory results. Our experiments avoided such problems by teaching subjects novel materials. Experiment 1 tested an implicit hierarchical structure in the features of a set of studied objects (e.g., all brown objects were large). Experiment 2 taught subjects nested categories of artificial bugs. In Experiment 3, subjects learned a tree structure of novel category hierarchies. In all three, the results differed from the predictions of the hierarchical inference model. In Experiment 4, subjects learned a hierarchy by means of paired associates of novel category names. Here we finally found the RT signature of hierarchical inference. We conclude that it is possible to store information in a hierarchy and retrieve it via inference, but it is difficult and avoided whenever possible. The results are more consistent with feature comparison models than hierarchical models of semantic memory.
四项实验研究了语义记忆中的一个经典问题,即人们是否像柯林斯和奎利恩(1969)所提出的那样,以层次结构组织分类信息并通过推理从中检索信息。过去的证据主要集中在对诸如“所有鸟类都是动物”或“金丝雀呼吸”等句子进行确认的反应时上。然而,诸如熟悉度和术语之间的关联等混杂变量导致了相互矛盾的结果。我们的实验通过向受试者教授新材料避免了此类问题。实验1测试了一组被研究对象特征中的隐含层次结构(例如,所有棕色物体都很大)。实验2向受试者教授了人工昆虫的嵌套类别。实验3中,受试者学习了新类别层次结构的树形结构。在这三个实验中,结果均与层次推理模型的预测不同。在实验4中,受试者通过新类别名称的配对联想学习了一个层次结构。在此我们最终发现了层次推理的反应时特征。我们得出结论,将信息存储在层次结构中并通过推理检索是可能的,但这很困难,并且只要有可能就会被避免。这些结果与语义记忆的特征比较模型比层次模型更为一致。